Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

Update: 2012-04-24

Description

A case in which the Court held that a neighbor of a proposed Indian casino had standing to sue the government for taking 147 acres of a town's land under Section 465 of the Indian Reorganization Act.

Comments

In Channel

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

2012-10-0101:00:29

Arizona v. United States

2012-04-2501:20:27

Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

2012-04-2401:02:23

RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. Amalgamated Bank

2012-04-2358:31

Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter

2012-04-18--:--

Dorsey v. United States

2012-04-1701:02:28

Christopher v. SmithKline

2012-04-1601:03:11

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

2012-03-2801:30:58

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

2012-03-2702:00:08

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

2012-03-2601:29:19

Reichle v. Howards

2012-03-2159:19

Vasquez v. United States

2012-03-2101:01:16

Miller v. Alabama

2012-03-2059:41

Southern Union Company v. United States

2012-03-1957:23

Astrue v. Capato

2012-03-1901:00:59

Armour v. City of Indianapolis

2012-02-2901:00:34

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

2012-02-2801:01:32

Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority

2012-02-2850:35

Elgin v. Department of the Treasury

2012-02-2701:00:28

Wood v. Milyard

2012-02-2701:01:26

00:00

1.0x

Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

#box-pro-ellipsis-175924949524184{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak

Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak