DiscoverMCMP – EpistemologyModels of rationality and the psychology of reasoning (From is to ought, and back)
Models of rationality and the psychology of reasoning (From is to ought, and back)

Models of rationality and the psychology of reasoning (From is to ought, and back)

Update: 2019-04-18
Share

Description

Vincenzo Crupi (Turin) gives a talk at the MCMP Colloquium (16 April, 2014) titled "Models of rationality and the psychology of reasoning (From is to ought, and back)". Abstract: Diagnoses of (ir)rationality often arise from the experimental investigation of human reasoning. Relying on joint work with Vittorio Girotto, I will suggest that such diagnoses can be disputed on various grounds, and provide a classification. I will then argue that much fruitful research done with classical experimental paradigms was triggered by normative concerns and yet fostered insight in properly psychological terms. My examples include the selection task, the conjunction fallacy, and so-called pseudodiagnosticity. Conclusion: normative considerations retain a constructive role for the psychology of reasoning, contrary to recent complaints in the literature.
Comments 
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Models of rationality and the psychology of reasoning (From is to ought, and back)

Models of rationality and the psychology of reasoning (From is to ought, and back)

Vincenzo Crupi (Turin)