“Naming serenity before even acknowledging thunder” refers to the travesty detected so plenty as severing prose and praise of desire: ‘I forbid this from my repertoire a priori given my idea that extra sensual deliberations bring paramount value to someone, versus physical satisfaction which does not.’

None of the distinctions made by intolerant to self-indulgence experimentation attendants of my podcast is causing a blurring as stalling than the hypothesis of pleasure corrupting your serenity!

What follows is two scenarios in recognition of which I provoke any listener who insists telling themselves they defy being tolerant of passionate behavior.