Not Just Another 4 Year Election, This Is A Crossroads To Reclaim Control Over Our Gov – Ep. 3529
Description
Watch The X22 Report On Video
<figure id="attachment_24366" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-24366" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><figcaption id="caption-attachment-24366" class="wp-caption-text">Click On Picture To See Larger Picture</figcaption></figure>
The [WEF][CB] are moving forward with their climate taxes, this is going to fail, they aren’t reading the room. China has surpassed the US in auto manufacturing. Trump want the Panama Canal back, move and countermoves. Trump is putting the pieces in place to transform the economy. The [DS] is losing every step of the way. The CR bill did not go the way they thought. Trump exposed the process and now the people know. The people are now involved. This is not just another 4 year election, this is a crossroads to reclaim control over out government. The [DS] is losing another battle, be prepared for another [FF]. They will not go down easily.
Economy
Denmark Passes The World’s First ‘Burp Tax’… But This Is No Laughing Matter
- Denmark, according to The New York Times (NYT), is going ahead with its livestock “Burp Tax.” Though hotly contested, the Danish government has nevertheless finally settled on levying farmers 300 kroners (~$43) per ton for carbon dioxide emissions, ramping to $106 per ton by 2035. As is the case with many of these farm-targeted green interventions, the action is ludicrously ineffectual at addressing the trumped-up problem, while remarkably effective at further cementing state controls over economic production.
- Part of the reason farms (and especially cows) are such fat targets for this kind of statist intervention is that, politically speaking, they are the perfect scapegoat.
- The Danish “Burp Tax” is a significant step toward the state ownership of the means of production, and as the history of centrally managed economies shows, it’s not likely to end well.
Source: zerohedge.com
- Available data and recent history contradict one of the key points of the Biden administration’s long-awaited study on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports and Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm’s attempt to spin the study into something it is not.
- The Department of Energy (DOE) released the study on Tuesday, nearly a year after the Biden administration froze approvals for LNG exports to non-free trade countries in January. The paper stops short of determining that more LNG export capacity is not in the public interest, but it suggests that significant growth in exports will drive up domestic natural gas prices despite all available evidence indicating that the exact opposite is true.
- “The U.S. Department of Energy’s updated study finds that a wide range of domestic consumers of natural gas – from households to farmers to heavy industry – would face higher prices from increased exports,” Granholm said in a statement addressing her agency’s report. “The study put forward today finds that unfettered exports of LNG would increase wholesale domestic natural gas prices by over 30%. Unconstrained exports of LNG would increase costs for the average American household by well over $100 more per year by 2050.” b
Source: thegatewaypundit.com
https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1870192500796797351
- this into perspective, China’s share in global automotive production was just 1% in 2000. By comparison, the US, Japan and Europe accounted for 14%, 20% and 32% of production in 2000, respectively. China has taken over the global car market.
<iframe loading="lazy" class="truthsocial-embed" style="max-width: 100%; border: 0;" src="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113693359542059043/embed" width="600" height="300" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" async="async"></script>
- was built at HUGE cost to the United States in lives and treasure – 38,000 American men died from infected mosquitos in the jungles during construction. Teddy Roosevelt was President of the United States at the time of its building, and understood the strength of Naval Power and Trade. When President Jimmy Carter foolishly gave it away, for One Dollar, during his term in Office, it was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else. It was likewise not given for Panama to charge the United States, its Navy, and corporations, doing business within our Country, exorbitant prices and rates of passage. Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the U.S. This complete “rip-off” of our Country will immediately stop….
<iframe loading="lazy" class="truthsocial-embed" style="max-width: 100%; border: 0;" src="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113693358988761213/embed" width="600" height="300" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe><script src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" async="async"></script>
The Panama Canal is owned and managed by the Republic of Panama through the Panama Canal Authority (ACP), an independent Panamanian government agency. However, China has increased its presence and influence in the area surrounding the canal:
- Chinese companies manage two of the five principal ports at the canal’s entrances, specifically at Balboa and Cristobal. These ports are operated by Hutchison Ports, a division of CK Hutchison Holdings, a Hong Kong-based company with significant Chinese investment.
- Infrastructure and Investment: China has been involved in various infrastructure projects in and around the canal, including the construction of a bridge, a cruise terminal, and other commercial projects. This involvement has sometimes raised concerns about strategic influence, but these do not equate to control over the canal itself.
- Economic Influence: China is a significant user