DiscoverSustainability MattersOriginality in the age of machine-generated text, part 2: Brainrot, peer-review, and the importance of voluntary reading
Originality in the age of machine-generated text, part 2: Brainrot, peer-review, and the importance of voluntary reading

Originality in the age of machine-generated text, part 2: Brainrot, peer-review, and the importance of voluntary reading

Update: 2025-08-13
Share

Description

In this second half of our special double episode of Sustainability Matters, we take a look at the impact of generative AI on academic culture. Should AI tools be used for peer review, grant writing, performance assessments, and the like? What makes “imperfect” human writing still worth defending? And finally, what happens to the value of voluntary reading in a world saturated with autogenerated content?

All this and more with Dr. Naomi S. Baron, author of the chapter, AI and Human Writing: Collaboration or Appropriation? which is part of The De Gruyter Handbook of Robots in Society and Culturepublished by De Gruyter Brill.


Guest: Dr. Naomi S. Baron 

Host: Ramzi Nasir

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Originality in the age of machine-generated text, part 2: Brainrot, peer-review, and the importance of voluntary reading

Originality in the age of machine-generated text, part 2: Brainrot, peer-review, and the importance of voluntary reading

De Gruyter Brill