DiscoverVerdicts and VoicesPlain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)
Plain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)

Plain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)

Update: 2025-12-10
Share

Description

Why can’t lawyers and judges just say what they mean? Legal documents – statutes, contracts, court decisions – are infamous for being dense and full of jargon (not to mention Latin). But a growing community of legal professionals is advocating plain language as a way to make the law more accessible, build trust in the justice system, and ensure that ordinary litigants can read a decision and, you know, understand whether they won or lost.

Karen Jacques is a Vice-Chair of Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal and the Canadian representative of Clarity International. Paul Aterman is a former Chair of the Social Security Tribunal of Canada and a board member of the Center for Plain Language.

Verdicts & Voices is a legal current affairs podcast presented by the Canadian Bar Association. With her retinue of expert guests, host Alison Crawford keeps listeners up to date on news, views, and stories about the law and the justice system in Canada.

Plain language resources:

Clarity International

Center for Plain Language

Plain International

Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please by Joseph Kimble

Mr. Mouthful children's books by Joseph Kimble

Simon Fraser University's Plain Language Certificate

 


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Comments 
In Channel
Season’s Readings!

Season’s Readings!

2025-12-1722:44

loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Plain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)

Plain language (or, Eschewing unnecessary obfuscation in juridical discourse)

Karen Jacques, Paul Aterman, Alison Crawford