DiscoverAI BreakdownPosition: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards
Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards

Update: 2025-07-31
Share

Description

In this episode, we discuss Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards by Jaeho Kim, Yunseok Lee, Seulki Lee. The paper addresses challenges in AI conference peer review caused by massive submission volumes and declining review quality. It proposes a bi-directional review system where authors evaluate reviewers, and reviewers receive formal accreditation to improve accountability. The paper focuses on reforming reviewer responsibility through a two-stage feedback loop and incentive mechanisms to promote sustainable, high-quality reviews.
Comments 
In Channel
The Markovian Thinker

The Markovian Thinker

2025-10-1607:48

General Social Agents

General Social Agents

2025-09-1508:30

loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards

Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards

agibreakdown