Problems with Probability

Update: 2018-04-24

Description

Simon Friederich and Erik Curiel discuss the problems fine-tuning arguments raise for our understanding of probability. In the first part of their discussion, Simon Friederich and Erik Curiel outline the fine-tuning argument and discuss the problems it raises for our understanding of probability. This discussion was conducted at the University of Oxford on October 6, 2017.

Comments

In Channel

Fine-Tuning Discussion

2018-04-2430:05

Erik Curiel: Measure, Topology, and Probability in Cosmology.

2018-04-2441:33

Natalja Deng: What Kind of Fine-Tuner?

2018-04-2433:59

Simon Friederich: Fine-Tuning for Life in the Universe, A Panoramic View

2018-04-2440:15

Evidence in the Multiverse

2018-04-2425:24

The Hard Fact of Life in Big Physics City

2018-04-2414:56

Stability and Probability

2018-04-2415:31

Problems with Probability

2018-04-2419:53

The New Era in Observational Cosmology

2017-04-0407:17

When is a theory good enough?

2017-04-0414:10

Can we measure naturalness?

2017-04-0407:46

An Encyclopedia of Inflation

2017-04-0424:12

Inflation in the Future

2017-04-0407:03

Strings, Inflation, and Alternatives

2017-04-0424:07

Inflation Predicts

2017-04-0415:53

Evidence For Inflation

2017-04-0421:33

Panel on Inflation

2017-04-0422:47

Does Inflationary Cosmology Solve Fine-Tuning Problems?

2017-04-0447:28

Inflationary Attractors

2017-04-0440:43

Inflation After Planck

2017-04-0448:58

00:00

Problems with Probability

Simon Friederich, Erik Curiel

#box-pro-ellipsis-175736407597139{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Problems with Probability

Problems with Probability

Simon Friederich, Erik Curiel

Problems with Probability