DiscoverAdvisory OpinionsProgressivism and Eugenics in the Court of Justice Holmes
Progressivism and Eugenics in the Court of Justice Holmes

Progressivism and Eugenics in the Court of Justice Holmes

Update: 2024-07-30
Share

Description

Sarah and David welcome special guest Anthony Sanders, director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice, to eviscerate Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Plus: David’s rant on Presumed Innocent.

The Agenda:

—Judicial engagement

—Social Darwinism and “putting to death the inadequate”

—Progressive forgiveness for progressives

—First Amendment

—Civil rights and judicial abdications

—Holmes’ defense of sterilization

—The difference between judicial progressives, liberals, and libertarians

—Spoiler alerts for Presumed Innocent

Show Notes:

Kelo v. New London

Institute of Justice’s Bound by Oath podcast series

Oliver Wendell Holmes’ The Common Law

Moore v. Dempsey

Buck v. Bell

Albert Alschuler’s Law Without Values

Giles v. Harris

Bailey v. Alabama

Buchanan v. Warley

Skinner v. Oklahoma

Lochner v. New York

Minersville School District v. Gobitis

Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Progressivism and Eugenics in the Court of Justice Holmes

Progressivism and Eugenics in the Court of Justice Holmes

The Dispatch