DiscoverACCEL Lite: Featured ACCEL Interviews on Exciting CV ResearchRisk vs. Benefit in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization
Risk vs. Benefit in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization

Risk vs. Benefit in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization

Update: 2025-08-19
Share

Description

Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO PCI) is a procedure used to open coronary arteries that have been completely blocked for an extended period. It offers benefits like reduced angina and improved quality of life but carries risks such as vessel injury, heart attack, and procedural failure. Before considering CTO PCI, physicians typically optimize patients on anti-anginal medications—such as beta-blockers, nitrates, and calcium channel blockers—to manage symptoms and evaluate the need for intervention. 

In this interview, Drs. Anthony N. DeMaria and Lindsey Cilia examine “Risk versus Benefit in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization.” 

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Risk vs. Benefit in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization

Risk vs. Benefit in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization