DiscoverDAYBELL MURDERS: The Case Against Lori Vallow & Chad DaybellSENTENCING PHASE- ID v Chad Daybell, Doomsday Prophet Murder Trial PART 1
SENTENCING PHASE- ID v Chad Daybell, Doomsday Prophet Murder Trial PART 1

SENTENCING PHASE- ID v Chad Daybell, Doomsday Prophet Murder Trial PART 1

Update: 2024-06-01
Share

Digest

The court heard arguments from both the prosecution and defense in the sentencing phase of Chad Daybell's trial. The prosecution argued for the death penalty, highlighting the aggravating circumstances of the murders, including the fact that they were committed for remuneration and were especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. The defense argued for a lesser sentence, emphasizing Chad Daybell's past as a quiet, reserved, and devout man who was deeply involved in his community and family. They argued that his trajectory changed after meeting Lori Valow, who brought chaos and extremism into his life. The court then heard victim impact statements from family members of the victims, including Tammy Daybell's father, JJ Valow's grandparents, and Tiley Ryan's aunt. These statements highlighted the immense pain and loss that the victims' families have endured.

Outlines

00:00:00
Introduction

This Chapter introduces the podcast episode and the ongoing trial of Chad Daybell, focusing on the sentencing phase of the trial.

00:00:07
Courtroom Proceedings

This Chapter begins with the court reconvening after a break and the judge outlining the rights of the defendant, Chad Daybell, in the sentencing phase. The judge explains the concepts of mitigation and allocution, and the instructions that will be given to the jury.

00:00:30
Sentencing Phase Instructions

This Chapter focuses on the judge reading additional instructions to the jury regarding the sentencing phase. The judge explains the aggravating circumstances alleged by the state, the burden of proof, and the role of mitigating factors.

00:12:33
Opening Statements

This Chapter covers the opening statements from both the prosecution and the defense. The prosecution outlines the aggravating circumstances they will be presenting to the jury, while the defense focuses on Chad Daybell's past and the impact of Lori Valow on his life.

00:24:36
Evidence and Victim Impact Statements

This Chapter details the court's decision to proceed with victim impact statements, as the state has chosen not to present any additional evidence. The chapter then features the victim impact statements from various family members of the victims, including Tammy Daybell's father, JJ Valow's grandparents, and Tiley Ryan's aunt.

Keywords

Chad Daybell


Chad Daybell is the defendant in the trial. He is accused of murdering Tammy Daybell, JJ Valow, and Tiley Ryan. He is a former author and religious figure who met Lori Valow in 2019. The trial has been highly publicized and has generated significant public interest.

Lori Valow


Lori Valow is a key figure in the case. She is the defendant's second wife and is also accused of murdering JJ Valow and Tiley Ryan. She is known for her extreme religious beliefs and her involvement in the doomsday cult, Preparing a People.

Tammy Daybell


Tammy Daybell is one of the victims in the case. She was Chad Daybell's first wife and was found dead in her home in October 2019. Her death was initially ruled as natural causes, but was later determined to be a homicide.

JJ Valow


JJ Valow is one of the victims in the case. He was Lori Valow's son from a previous marriage and was found dead in his home in September 2019. His death was initially ruled as natural causes, but was later determined to be a homicide.

Tiley Ryan


Tiley Ryan is one of the victims in the case. She was Lori Valow's niece and was found dead in Chad Daybell's backyard in June 2020. Her death was determined to be a homicide.

Sentencing Phase


The sentencing phase of a trial occurs after a defendant has been found guilty. During this phase, the jury determines the appropriate sentence for the defendant. In capital cases, the jury must decide whether to impose the death penalty or a lesser sentence.

Aggravating Circumstances


Aggravating circumstances are factors that make a crime more serious and can justify a harsher sentence. In capital cases, aggravating circumstances can include factors such as the heinousness of the crime, the defendant's prior criminal history, or the presence of multiple victims.

Mitigation


Mitigation refers to factors that can lessen the severity of a crime or the defendant's culpability. In capital cases, mitigating factors can include factors such as the defendant's mental state, their lack of prior criminal history, or their remorse for the crime.

Victim Impact Statement


A victim impact statement is a statement made by a victim or a victim's family member that describes the impact of the crime on their lives. These statements are often presented during the sentencing phase of a trial and can be used to inform the jury's decision about the appropriate sentence.

Q&A

  • What are the aggravating circumstances alleged by the prosecution in Chad Daybell's trial?

    The prosecution alleges several aggravating circumstances, including that the murders were committed for remuneration and that they were especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, manifesting exceptional depravity.

  • What is the defense's argument for a lesser sentence for Chad Daybell?

    The defense argues that Chad Daybell was a quiet, reserved, and devout man who was deeply involved in his community and family before meeting Lori Valow. They argue that Lori Valow brought chaos and extremism into his life, which led to his involvement in the murders.

  • What is the significance of the victim impact statements in Chad Daybell's trial?

    The victim impact statements provide the jury with a personal perspective on the impact of the crimes on the victims' families. These statements can be powerful evidence that can influence the jury's decision about the appropriate sentence.

  • What is the role of mitigation in the sentencing phase of a trial?

    Mitigation refers to factors that can lessen the severity of a crime or the defendant's culpability. In capital cases, mitigating factors can be used to argue for a lesser sentence.

  • What is the difference between aggravating circumstances and mitigating factors?

    Aggravating circumstances are factors that make a crime more serious and can justify a harsher sentence. Mitigating factors are factors that can lessen the severity of a crime or the defendant's culpability.

Show Notes

During Friday's session, emotional testimonies from the victims' families were anticipated, aiming to provide the jury with a deeper understanding of the devastating impact of Daybell's actions. These statements are critical as they contribute to the jury's decision on the appropriate sentence for Daybell.

 

 The courtroom heard first from Colby Ryan, Tylee's brother, who struggled through tears to convey his grief. "I will never get to see my sister grow up or achieve her dreams," he said. "She was robbed of her life, and we were robbed of her presence."

 

 Following Colby, Larry and Kay Woodcock, JJ Vallow's grandparents, took the stand. Larry's voice shook as he described the pain of losing JJ, saying, "JJ was a light in our lives, and that light was cruelly extinguished. We will never recover from this loss."

 

 As the day progressed, Tammy Daybell's family shared their anguish. Tammy's sister, Samantha Gwilliam, addressed the court with a mixture of sorrow and anger. "Tammy was a loving wife, mother, and sister. She deserved so much more than to be a victim of such betrayal and violence," Gwilliam stated.

 

 The prosecution highlighted the cold and calculated nature of Daybell's actions, urging the jury to consider the maximum penalty. "Chad Daybell's crimes were premeditated and heinous. The loss felt by these families is immeasurable," said Prosecutor Rob Wood. "Justice demands that he faces the severest consequences."

 

 Daybell's defense team sought to humanize their client, arguing that his life should be spared. "While Mr. Daybell has been convicted, he is still a father and has family who care about him. We ask the jury to consider life in prison without the possibility of parole," pleaded defense attorney John Prior.

 

 The jury's deliberation on whether Daybell should receive a life sentence or the death penalty is expected to be intense and potentially lengthy, given the gravity of the crimes and the emotional weight of the victim impact statements.

 

 Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Comments 
In Channel
loading

Table of contents

00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

SENTENCING PHASE- ID v Chad Daybell, Doomsday Prophet Murder Trial PART 1

SENTENCING PHASE- ID v Chad Daybell, Doomsday Prophet Murder Trial PART 1

True Crime Today