This episode centered around questions from readers and includes  the following topics:

• Woodward Tournament Review: Disclosure Award, Division Eligibility, Scott’s Absence


• Announcement: Will Repko Podcast at the NDCA


• Next Year’s Topic: What generic counterplans will be popular? What generic critiques will be popular?


• Roy’s Topic Idea: Forcible regime change in Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba


• More Tabulation Discussion: Should undefeated teams that are due the same side debate each other in round 6? Should the Woodward Tournament adopt the Challenge format for elimination rounds? Other tweaks: high-high rounds, MBA system (opponent wins + high-low points)


• Return To The Game: What would Scott/Roy do differently if they came back and debated again?


• Today’s Debaters: What do they do better and worse than previous generations?


• Preparation For The TOC: Risk Aversion, Strategies, Flexibility, etc.


• K Preparation For Dummies: Preparing to go for a K if you’re a “policy” debater (and vice versa)


• Judge Adaptation: Do people judge differently at the TOC? Should they?

In this episode: Bill Batterman, Roy Levkovitz, Scott Phillips.