Shevuot 34: Why oaths of testimony apply solely in monetary cases
Update: 2018-01-01
Description
- Braita with four Tannaitic opinions on why oaths of testimony apply solely to monetary cases (33b-34a); 2) R' Eliezer's approach: highlighting the similarities between oaths of testimony and oaths of deposit (34a); 3) R' Akiva: not fundamentally disagreeing with R' Eliezer (34a); 4) R' Yosi Haglili: Why we allow the most circumstantial evidence for monetary cases (34a); 5) Two cases of impartial testimony (34a-34b).
Click here to read the source sheet
Click here for the board layout
Rabbi Eli Yoggev can be reached for questions and comments at eyoggev@btfiloh.org.
Comments
In Channel