Show us the Evidence: Are the Tools We’re Using for Residency Selection Really the Best We’ve Got?

Update: 2024-01-24

Description

In this episode, Jeremy M. Lipman, MD, and Judith French, PhD, discuss their systematic review of metrics utilized in the selection and prediction of future performance of residents in the United States. They share their findings, like the fact that most metrics used are not backed by evidence, as well as practical advice for program directors to effectively recruit residents where both the resident and the program will thrive.

Comments

In Channel

Less Angst and More Fun: Writing Strategies and Writing Groups for Scholarship (audio version)

2025-10-1509:53

Leading Major Change in Graduate Medical Education: Initiate, Implement, and Sustain (audio version)

2025-10-1508:55

Reimagining Residency: An American Medical Association Initiative to Transform GME

2025-07-0126:46

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Residency Application Evaluation—A Scoping Review (audio version)

2025-06-1717:57

A Practical Guide to Writing Effective Needs Assessments in Graduate Medical Education (audio version)

2025-06-1712:03

How to Avoid the Dreaded Desk Reject

2025-06-1308:10

The Importance of Educating Physicians for Climate-Related Issues in Practice: A Conversation With Climate and GME Supplement Editors

2025-03-1721:34

Leading From the Middle Empowers GME Leaders (audio version)

2025-02-1408:57

Getting Started as a Peer Reviewer

2024-10-1533:55

Ted Talks: Learning the Lasso Way

2024-08-0710:12

JGME Literature Review Series: Finding the Right Approach to Knowledge Synthesis