Supreme Court Roundup: Quiet End to 2025, High-Profile Cases Ahead
Update: 2025-12-19
Description
The Supreme Court is in a relatively quiet phase as the year winds down, with no new decisions issued in the past three days, though several high-profile matters remain on its docket. On Thursday, the justices denied a stay of execution for Florida inmate Frank Walls, allowing his execution to proceed as the 19th in the state this year. Pending cases that could emerge at any moment include President Trump's effort to deploy the National Guard to Illinois and a dispute with immigration judges. The court recently agreed to hear Pitchford v. Cain, challenging a death sentence over alleged racial discrimination in jury selection, marking its latest grant of review. Broader immigration tensions continue to swirl around Trump v. Washington, where the justices on December 5 took up the president's January executive order curtailing birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visitors, with arguments expected soon and a ruling likely next summer; ACLU Legal Director Cecillia Wang will argue against the order, calling it an unconstitutional overreach. In related developments, internal guidance from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services pushes field offices to pursue 100 to 200 denaturalization cases monthly as part of the administration's crackdown. Meanwhile, lower courts are reacting to Supreme Court precedents: a federal panel blocked Michigan's ban on conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ minors on First Amendment grounds, citing free speech protections for therapists, while a Washington district court ordered the immediate release of a habeas petitioner in Vo v. Bondi. Looking back, 2025 saw pivotal rulings like Trump v. CASA limiting universal injunctions and United States v. Skrmetti upholding Tennessee's restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors, shaping ongoing debates on everything from the Colorado River basin's expiring water agreements to the court's next Second Amendment clash in United States v. Hemani.
Thanks for tuning in, listeners—don't forget to subscribe for more updates. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Thanks for tuning in, listeners—don't forget to subscribe for more updates. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
CommentsÂ
In Channel





