The Impossibility of Proving that Human Behavior is Determined / Richard Swinburne

Update: 2013-07-12

Description

Dr. Richard Swinburne explains why a theory of neuroscience built on physical determinism is implausible and ultimately unprovable. Dr. Swinburne takes his audience through careful logical scenarios to arrive at his conclusion. Following his argument, two philosophers offer their own comments on Dr. Swinburne's conclusion.

Comments

In Channel

The Unbearable Embeddedness of Being: Toward a Post-Cartesian Psychotherapy / Brad Strawn

2013-07-1201:05:54

Panel Discussion 4 / Brad Strawn

2013-07-1231:00

Mental vs. Top-down Causation: Sic et Non / J.P. Moreland

2013-07-1259:05

The Dialectic of Soul and Body / William Hasker

2013-07-1201:11:18

On Doing Without a Soul: A New Testament Perspective / Joel Green

2013-07-1201:11:03

Biblical Hermeneutics and the Body-Soul Debate / John W. Cooper

2013-07-1256:24

Panel Discussion 2 / Joel Green

2013-07-1248:58

Christian Theology, Science, and the Human Soul / Tim O'Connor

2013-07-1259:42

Panel Discussion 1 / Richard Swinburne

2013-07-1245:46

The Impossibility of Proving that Human Behavior is Determined / Richard Swinburne

2013-07-1201:01:59

Panel Discussion 3 / William Hasker

2013-07-1144:04

The Brain, Consciousness, and Human Meaning: Case Studies from Neuroscience / William Hurlbut

2013-07-0101:14:46

00:00

The Impossibility of Proving that Human Behavior is Determined / Richard Swinburne

#box-pro-ellipsis-176038633302394{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}The Impossibility of Proving that Human Behavior is Determined / Richard Swinburne

The Impossibility of Proving that Human Behavior is Determined / Richard Swinburne

Richard Swinburne

The Impossibility of Proving that Human Behavior is Determined / Richard Swinburne