DiscoverPatrick Holford: Simple Wisdom for a Healthy LifeThe Lancet Omission: Is Ignoring Nutrition Prevention Bad Science?
The Lancet Omission: Is Ignoring Nutrition Prevention Bad Science?

The Lancet Omission: Is Ignoring Nutrition Prevention Bad Science?

Update: 2024-09-06
Share

Description

The latest iteration of the highly influential Lancet Commission on dementia prevention, authored by numerous professors from around the world, led by University College London’s psychiatry Professor Gill Livingston has, for the third time, ignored the hardest hitting evidence for homocysteine lowering B vitamins, misrepresented the science on omega-3 and concluded that the evidence for ‘unhealthy diet’ didn’t meet their high bar for inclusion as a modifiable risk factor.


Several eminent professors are up in arms and have written to the Lancet. In this podcast I interview three of them – Professor Joshua Miller, Professor of Nutritional Science at Rutgers University; omega-3 expert Professor William Harris from the Fatty Acid Research Institute (FARI) and Professor Richard Johnson from Colorado University’s School of Medicine - to explore how the establishment continue to side-line nutrition.


Read more on Alzheimer's, Dementia and brain health on my website. 


Read the Lancet report


More about Food for the Brain.

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The Lancet Omission: Is Ignoring Nutrition Prevention Bad Science?

The Lancet Omission: Is Ignoring Nutrition Prevention Bad Science?

patrickholford