I’m loathe to waste ink on the Democrats’ latest Trump hoax (Epstein, again), but ignoring it only rewards the media machine that decides—for all of us—what counts as “news.” For more than half a century, the party of destruction has gripped the American narrative in a chokehold, tearing this once-great nation down brick by brick while their stenographers in the press nod along.

Now they’re at it again. Another fabrication, conjured out of thin air, and once more the entire media ecosystem snaps to attention, dutifully amplifying the lie they’ve been handed.

The Democrat-engineered government shutdown has been crushed but the media stooges aren’t talking about that. They blew up a lie that actually, in fact, exonerates President Trump.

The Democrats’ released a redacted version of an email supplanting the name “Virginia” with “VICTIM”, knowing full well the original estate documents included “Virginia Giuffre implying Giuffre was Trump’s “victim.”

The unredacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre. Guiffre had testified multiple times that President Trump did nothing and that she never even saw him at Epstein’s house.

These Epstein/Maxwell emails reference Virginia Giuffre.

Giuffre's testimony contradicts them:

She never saw Trump and Epstein together.

Trump never acted inappropriately towards her (no sex and no flirting).

She was never at Epstein's house with Trump. https://t.co/obTvvQbh8g pic.twitter.com/zOQRQHep7r

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) November 12, 2025

This is from Virginia Giuffre herself in a 2016 deposition:

— “Trump didn’t partake in any sex with us, and it’s not true that he flirted with me… I didn’t see him have sex with any of the girls. Trump was never in the presence of ‘other girls’.”

Their “VICTIM” Virginia Giuffre fully vindicated Donald Trump 2016 and many times in the years to come.

Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the “victim” in the Epstein emails they released.

There is someone who needs to do some explaining, NY Times reporter Michael Wolff  who spent time huge swaths of time with Jeffery Epstein.

The NY Times was colluding with Jeffrey Epstein years ago after he was a known child sex trafficker. They even offered him PR advice.

The NY Times is now colluding with Democrats to secretly edit Epstein stories to smear President Trump.

No one should be shocked. https://t.co/gF97fJcrU5

— Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) November 13, 2025

OMG, I just realized something..

The real scandal in these emails isn’t Trump and Epstein—it’s Michael Wolff, a leading journalist, COACHING a convicted sex offender on how to manipulate a presidential candidate for personal and political gain.

This is very serious actually…… https://t.co/ZJXb1N9yuc pic.twitter.com/hri8pUaNdD

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) November 12, 2025

Big news the media isn’t talking about:

Democrat Goverment Shutdown is OVER

Congressional Bill H.R. 5371 Signed into Law

NEW DATA: Lower Prices, Bigger Paychecks

Trump Administration Cracks Down on Foreign-Owned Meat Packing Cartels

Anti-Communism Week, 2025

President Donald J. Trump Secures Major Settlement with Cornell

Democrats Are to Blame for Airport Chaos

Mark Levin’s scathing take: The reporting is outrageous, and the headlines are grotesquely dishonest. The victim whose name is redacted is well known, Virginia Giuffre, who testified under oath and under penalty of perjury that Donald Trump never so much as flirted with her. We also read the sleazy efforts by certain reporters to push a false narrative and smear Trump. So, the question is: why did the Democrats release these emails, why did they release them now, why did they redact Giuffre’s name, and why are the media acting like there’s some bombshell?

The “release the files” crowd remind me of the “release the tax returns” crowd. There was no wrongdoing in the president’s tax returns, but they were leaked. And if there was wrongdoing by Trump in those so-called Epstein files, the question I keep asking is why wasn’t a single example of wrongdoing raised by the Biden regime or anyone else? Even now.

So, why not release the files? Exactly what “files” are they talking about? And what of Epstein’s victims? Do they get a say in whether files are released? It seems a lot more complicated to me. That said, the smearing of the president is totally unwarranted, even by his worst enemies, and certainly by his supposed friends and allies.

But media was implicated in the new emails. The New York Times:

Michael Wolff made ‘pile of cash’ writing Trump takedowns. Meanwhile he was advising Epstein https://t.co/ssAvWKb7ru

— Bryn (@Bryn32050638) November 13, 2025

More on Epstein adviser/strategist Michael Wolff. https://t.co/eE7gVBFqQK

— Byron York (@ByronYork) November 13, 2025

So, let me get this straight:

With the release of Epstein’s emails, we found out that
– Epstein hated Trump.
– Didn’t trust him.
– They weren’t friends.
– The NYT directly worked with Epstein to suppress stories about him.
– After Bradley Edwards (the lawyer for the…

— Sólionath (@Anarseldain) November 13, 2025

BREAKING: The Democrats deleted their post claiming that President Trump spent Thanksgiving with Epstein in 2017.

Probably because it’s an easily disprovable lie and the attempts to connect President Trump to Epstein’s crimes are a giant hoax. pic.twitter.com/dY5winZ4dJ

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 13, 2025

Epstein emails: The Dems and their lapdogs with laptops cry Wolff again

By: NY Post Editorial Board, Nov. 12, 2025:

A newly released email from disgraced late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, referencing his former companion Ghislaine Maxwell and

What a low and cynical move by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee — releasing just enough of a Jeffrey Epstein email early Wednesday to inspire the most hysterical possible Trump-smearing coverage.

Even as they knew the full facts told a completely different story.

Of course all manner of “responsible” media played along: These lapdogs with laptops offered a host of headlines with some variation of “Trump spent hours alone with Epstein victim” — dirt that in this age of the internet will be the lasting impression many Americans take away, even though it’s centrally false.

Specifically, Dems circulated this carefully redacted email from the vile procurer:

“i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump..[VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned.”

Looks terrible — until you learn that [VICTIM] is the late Virginia Giuffre, who had worked for Trump before she fell into Epstein’s clutches, and had publicly said time and again that the future president never misbehaved in the least toward her.

Plus: Since Giuffre is dead, and so can’t possibly be hurt by any revelations, the only reason to block out her name was to conceal the fact that