DiscoverRevisionist HistoryThe Satire Paradox
The Satire Paradox

The Satire Paradox

Update: 2016-08-1896
Share

Description

In the political turmoil of mid-1990s Britain, a brilliant

young comic named Harry Enfield set out to satirize the ideology and politics

of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. His parodies became famous. He wrote and

performed a vicious sendup of the typical Thatcherite nouveau riche buffoon. People

loved it. And what happened? Exactly the opposite of what Enfield hoped would

happen. In an age dominated by political comedy, “The Satire Paradox”asks whether laughter and social

protest are friends or foes. 

To learn more about the topics covered in this episode, visit www.RevisionistHistory.com

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers
Comments (6)

john Taylor

Harry Enfield was wrong about Loadsamoney making no difference; it made him into a rich man sneering at other rich people.

Nov 22nd
Reply

Vasavadatta Yt

there is a big difference between humor and satire, which I think has been rather overlooked here.tina fey and her piece on Sarah Palin was hilarious and funny - and hardly satirical. good satire has a hard point it is trying to make - if that isn't evident, it is just humor. or that the examples of stellar satire fawned about in this podcast are actually absolutely terrible satire.

Nov 16th
Reply (1)

Misanthropy

"Lord help us if an even more unqualified candidate comes along." Well, he did, and he won and spent 8 years eroding our country thanks to these same people, which is why their satire was meaningless. It's their hypocrisy that makes their satire meaningless.

Sep 8th
Reply (1)

Borja Bernasconi

👌👌

Aug 8th
Reply
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The Satire Paradox

The Satire Paradox

Pushkin Industries