The acceptance of humanitarian intervention

Update: 2024-10-18

Description

This podcast examines the acceptance of the humanitarian organization Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in the areas where it operates. It focuses in particular on the individual memberships of direct aid beneficiaries and the more general recognition of the organization by the local social fabric.

Original written article: https://shs.cairn.info/revue-ecrire-le-social-la-revue-de-l-aifris-2020-1-page-32

Comments

In Channel

1/5 - When “saving the world” is a source of dissatisfaction

2024-10-2107:03

2/5 - When “saving the world” is a source of dissatisfaction

2024-10-2110:09

3/5 - When “saving the world” is a source of dissatisfaction

2024-10-2210:53

4/5 - When “saving the world” is a source of dissatisfaction

2024-10-2215:01

5/5 - When “saving the world” is a source of dissatisfaction

2024-10-2210:34

From traumatic stress to job stress

2024-10-1720:19

The acceptance of humanitarian intervention

2024-10-1811:43

Interest, disinterestedness and indifference

2024-10-1808:40

A mobility capital?

2024-10-1809:24

Are humanitarian workers precarious?

2024-10-1908:46

Who is legitimate to speak out within MSF?

2024-10-1912:31

Changes brought about by the southernization

2024-10-1910:36

Off-work and intimacy during missions

2024-10-2011:51

How to sanction without causing pain?

2024-10-2013:26

Are doctors without borders doctors without a homeland?

2024-10-2018:43

(All at once) When “saving the world” is a source of dissatisfaction

2024-10-2108:29

00:00

1.0x

The acceptance of humanitarian intervention

#box-pro-ellipsis-175997850462491{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}The acceptance of humanitarian intervention

The acceptance of humanitarian intervention

Ludovic Joxe

The acceptance of humanitarian intervention