Byline Times is an independent, reader-funded investigative newspaper, outside of the system of the established press, reporting on 'what the papers don't say' - without fear or favour.

To support its work, subscribe to the monthly Byline Times print edition, packed with exclusive investigations, news, and analysis.

Help us build the better media Britain deserves

Britain's official elections watchdog has called for an overhaul of election rules after concerns about people attempting to mislead voters by impersonating real candidates, or providing fake details to get on the ballot paper in this year's General Election.

In a new report on the handling of July's election, the Electoral Commission highlighted the case of YouTuber Niko Omilana, who successfully encouraged his followers to stand as candidates, under his own name, in at least 11 constituencies.

At the time it was unclear who the candidates were, or whether they were all the same person.

It comes after similar concerns were raised about so-called 'invisible' Reform candidates during the General Election, for whom almost no information could be accessed by voters or even reporters.

Reform UK fielded dozens of super-anonymous candidates in the 2024 General Election - potentially netting the party hundreds of thousands of pounds in extra public cash, or 'Short money', and hiking its national spending limits.

There is no suggestion the candidates did not exist, but the affair highlighted the fact that those seeking election do not have to provide ID to apply to stand, while voters do need ID in order to vote. Councils are also unable to conduct checks on whether potential candidates actually exist or are providing accurate information.

Don't miss a story

SIGN UP TO EMAIL UPDATES

No Checks

Under current election law in the UK, local Returning Officers must accept candidate nominations if only very basic paperwork requirements are met. Election staff have no power to investigate candidates' true identities or reject potentially misleading nominations.

And candidates do not have to show identification when applying to run, despite voters having to do so at the ballot box.

The Commission says this puts officials "in a difficult position" and risks confusing voters about who they are voting for.

In its new report, the electoral watchdog recommends that candidates should have to provide proof of identity when standing for election - noting that voters currently face stricter ID requirements than those seeking to represent them.

The watchdog also backed previous Law Commission proposals to give Returning Officers explicit powers to reject nominations that appear "designed to confuse or mislead electors".

BREAKING

Vast Majority of Those Turned Away Over Voter ID in Local Elections Were 'Non-White' According to Polling Station Observers

The figure has surged compared to last year's local elections, raising concerns over discrimination, the UK's leading election monitoring group has warned

Josiah Mortimer

And while the report highlighted that while it is illegal for candidates to stand in multiple constituencies, there is currently no system to easily check if this rule is being broken.

An Electoral Commission spokesperson said the recommendations aim to strengthen the nomination process while maintaining accessibility and protecting the impartiality of election officials.

The report noted: "The requirements and checks for nominating candidates should be strengthened to make it harder for candidates to mislead voters about their true identity.

"Voters must now provide proof of their identity when they register to vote, apply for an absent vote or cast their vote at a polling station - but candidates do not have to provide any proof of identity to be nominated…

"There is currently no mechanism to easily identify whether any candidates have agreed to be nominated in more than one constituency. It may also be necessary to develop a process for collating details of all candidates at...