VDM V BLORD CONTROVERSY, THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS AS WELL AS LEGAL OPINION ON THE CASE
Description
In today's episode David Njoku discussed on a trending controversial dispute between Vincent Martins (VeryDarkMan) and Linus Martins (Blord). We discussed the legal implications of their actions and whether or not there are liable on any statute in Nigeria.
We highlighted that BLord's action did not amount to misrepresentation or fraud as pursuant to Section 419 of the Criminal Code. Reason being that he disclosed publicly that the product in question was a rebranded iPhone XR in iPhone 17 body. This showed transparency on BLord's side. However, we also identified how the release of that obscene material on his Instagram story contravened Section 24(1)(a),(b) of the Cyber Crimes Act making his liable to fine of 7 million naira or imprisonment of up to 3 years or both fine and imprisonment.
PLEASE NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PODCAST IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT TAKE ANY OF OUR EPISODES FOR LEGAL ADVICE. FOR LEGAL ADVICE PLEASE CONSULT YOUR LAWYER.
Please like, share and comment your thoughts. I'll be happy to reply your comments! My name is David Njoku and I'm a law student in Nigeria. Thanks for listening!
Follow our social handles:
TikTok ▶️ tiktok.com/@ltw_davidnjoku
Instagram ▶️ instagram.com/ltw_davidnjoku
Facebook ▶️ facebook.com/ltwdavidnjoku
X ▶️ x.com/ltw_davidnjoku
Visit Website










