Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent

Update: 2021-06-08

Description

Professor Gopal Sreenivasan delivers a New St Cross Special Ethics Seminar on the topic of Informed Consent. This talk develops a novel argument to show that prospective research subjects can validly consent to participate in a study without understanding (most of) the content of the required disclosure. Its point of departure is the right subjects standardly have to waive (most of) the investigator’s duty to disclose. Things get worse for autonomy based defences of informed consent because this right to waive is very well grounded in an individual’s autonomy.

Comments

In Channel

The Vagueness of Demandingness Objections

2024-03-2838:29

Morality and Personality

2023-11-0945:51

Is AI bad for democracy? Analyzing AI’s impact on epistemic agency

2023-03-1330:38

Shallow Cognizing for Self-Control over Emotion & Desire

2023-02-0245:26

The Moral Machine Experiment

2022-11-0949:03

Hope in Healthcare

2022-06-2048:38

Against Legalizing Female 'Circumcision' of Minors

2022-05-1601:07:53

Vaccine policies and challenge trials: the ethics of relative risk in public health

2021-11-2453:14

Do We Need Mental Privacy? The Ethics of Mind Reading Reloaded

2021-11-2235:40

Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent

2021-06-0844:14

Fighting diseases of poverty through research: Deadly dilemmas, moral distress and misplaced responsibilities

2021-05-2452:41

Towards a plasticity of the mind – New-ish ethical conundrums in dementia care, treatment, and research

2021-03-0139:07

The Neuroscience of a Life Well-Lived

2021-01-2744:36

Affect, Value and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity

2020-11-2347:45

Conscience Rights or Conscience Wrongs?: Debating conscientious objection in healthcare

2020-10-1401:28:37

Choosing Now for Later: Precedent Autonomy and Problem of Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Brain Injury

2020-06-1956:20

Choosing Now for Later: Precedent Autonomy and Problem of Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Brain Injury (Transcript)

2020-06-19--:--

Medically Assisted Dying in Canada: from where we’ve come; to where we’re heading

2020-05-1101:23:23

Medically Assisted Dying in Canada: from where we’ve come; to where we’re heading (Transcript)

2020-05-11--:--

Why is mental healthcare so ethically confusing? Clinicians and institutions from an anthropological perspective

2020-02-1739:50

00:00

Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent

#box-pro-ellipsis-17572028483495{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent

Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent

Gopal Sreenivasan

Waiver or understanding? A dilemma for autonomists about informed consent