When Copy & Paste Gets Costly, & other recent cases
Update: 2025-09-10
Description
Failing to cite your secondary sources in briefs is poor form. But is it plagiarism? Jeff and Tim debate. And when the Supreme Court The publishes a case, should it explain itself? PJ Gilbert and Tim say yes, Supreme Court and Jeff disagree.
Also in this episode:
- Can copying from a CLE article really get you sanctioned? Kelly v. Tao suggests… maybe.
- Presiding Justice Gilbert rails (again) against the Court's silent de-publishing practices.
- Deny a request for admission in a one-way fee-shifting case? You might still owe fees—Gammo v. Morrell.
- $105k in sanctions after failing to abandon claims disproven in discovery—Atlantic v. Baroness.
- The perils of citing the wrong fee statute—Martin v. Hogue.
- Gibson Dunn bills $1.8M for May alone in public interest litigation over LA homelessness.
- Can ChatGPT testify against you? OpenAI’s CEO says maybe.
- How AI tools are reshaping billing, ethics, and expectations for appellate lawyers.
Tune in for AI ethics, briefing blunders, and why even your RFA denials could cost you.
Comments
In Channel
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States00:00
00:00
x
