DiscoverGeopolitics Decanted with Dmitri AlperovitchWhy Drones Can’t Replace Traditional Firepower
Why Drones Can’t Replace Traditional Firepower

Why Drones Can’t Replace Traditional Firepower

Update: 2025-08-05
Share

Description

Dmitri Alperovitch talks to air power expert Justin Bronk about why it's a bad idea for Western militaries to follow Ukraine's lead and overly invest in production of small drones like FPVs and other loitering munitions. They also dive into best counter-drone strategies, as well as the implications of Ukraine's Operation SpiderWeb and Israel's forward deployed drones neutralizing Iranian air defenses during Operations Rising Lion for strategies to protect aircraft and air-defenses against such threats.


00:00 Introduction


00:28 Why NATO Should Not Follow Ukraine Into Overreliance on Drones


09:22 Small FPVs vs Other Drone Types


15:42 Best Strategy for Effective Anti Drone Defense


26:06 Would Ukraine Be Better Off Spending Money on Conventional Systems?


28:01 Orchestration of Combined Arms Warfare


29:11 Does Ukraine Need More FPVs or Artillery?


31:33 Can America Afford to Invest in Both Small Drones and Conventional Systems?


34:06 Options for Neutralizing Air Defenses


36:53 The State of Russian Air Defenses


38:53 How to Protect Air Forces Against Operation SpiderWeb-style drone tactics


44:35 Assessing the Efficacy of Ukrainian F-16s 


 


NATO Should Not Replace Traditional Firepower with ‘Drones’: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/rusi-defence-systems/nato-should-not-replace-traditional-firepower-drones

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Why Drones Can’t Replace Traditional Firepower

Why Drones Can’t Replace Traditional Firepower

Dmitri Alperovitch, Justin Bronk