Why diversionary policy, while bad, is still legal

Update: 2020-09-18

Description

International rules-based order seems to play by its own rules, especially when it comes to using international conflict to distract from domestic woes. Prof. Poast explains how politicians get around international agreements to suit their needs without breaking international law.

Comments

In Channel

With Great Power comes great responsibility…or lots of compromise.

2021-11-1117:47

A personal reflection on 9/11

2021-09-2122:53

What Over-the-horizon really means.

2021-09-0323:02

Looking forward in IR

2021-07-2927:21

Back to the future with John Mearsheimer

2021-07-1115:17

Biden's dialogue about dialogue , EU, NATO, and Putin

2021-06-2722:39

EU,China,Putin and how about a tech treaty?

2021-06-1018:32

Does the U.S. have a realist foreign policy and does it follow it?

2021-05-1527:06

Why Iran is important but not a priority

2021-03-1924:07

How will Biden relate to the world?

2021-02-1726:42

How Trump changed international relations

2021-02-0220:32

So, what do IR scholars actually do?

2020-12-0923:26

What Biden's Cabinet means for international relations

2020-11-2430:45

Why aiming for dominance may fail to make America great again

2020-10-2020:02

How international relations helps Pres. Trump (sometimes)

2020-10-0524:10

Why diversionary policy, while bad, is still legal

2020-09-1818:03

How Secretary Pompeo’s rates on international relations

2020-09-0125:48

Why looking back too far won't help with today's problems

2020-08-1420:32

What a world order looks like without the US

2020-08-0321:00

As foes form friendships, America may be its own worst enemy

2020-07-1516:55

00:00

Why diversionary policy, while bad, is still legal

#box-pro-ellipsis-176157646209312{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Why diversionary policy, while bad, is still legal

Why diversionary policy, while bad, is still legal

cpost

Why diversionary policy, while bad, is still legal