10/2/25 SCCRTC Part 5 - Coastal Trail Project Delivery

10/2/25 SCCRTC Part 5 - Coastal Trail Project Delivery

Update: 2025-10-08
Share

Description

Overview

  • Coastal Rail Trail Segments 8-11 face significant funding and delivery challenges.
  • Escalating costs and funding gaps threaten project timelines and scope.
  • Multiple phasing and scope reduction options analyzed; none fully close the funding gap.
  • $19.5M federal RAISE grant and $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant (pending) are key funding sources.
  • Measure D sales tax is critical for leveraging state and federal funds, but is insufficient for full buildout.
  • Project delivery is at risk due to strict grant deadlines and limited new funding opportunities.

Project Introduction and Recusal for Conflict of Interest

  • Coastal Rail Trail Segments 8-11 project delivery discussed.
  • Chair Montecito recused due to conflict of interest.
  • Planning grant for Watsonville circulation pursued, supporting previous Reconnecting Communities grant application.
  • Focus on future project planning in City of Watsonville.

Project Overview, Funding Success, and Challenges

  • Coastal Rail Trail is a 32-mile multi-use path from Davenport to Pajaro.
  • Project divided into segments; current focus on segments 8–11 (Santa Cruz to Aptos).
  • Project approval and environmental phase began in 2020; construction scheduled for 2027.
  • Construction expected to take 2–4 years; significant time spent on environmental review and design.
  • Recent efforts focus on cost reduction and project delivery strategies due to funding shortfalls.

Cost Escalation, Funding Gaps, and Phasing Options

  • Value engineering analysis and MOU with Roaring Camp completed to reduce track relocation costs.
  • Secured $19.5M federal RAISE grant; City of Santa Cruz applied for $20.5M Safe Streets for All grant.
  • Coastal Rail Trail segments 8–11 require additional funding for final design and construction by 2027.
  • Existing grants do not cover cost increases; new state and federal funding is scarce and competitive.
  • Project phasing and scope reduction options analyzed, but even minimal reductions exceed available Measure D revenues.

Financial Scenarios, Grant Assumptions, and Feasibility Analysis

  • Future project phases require funding; no identified source yet.
  • Assumed minimum local match is 20% of project cost; higher match increases competitiveness.
  • Option C funds 1.5 of 6.5 miles with Measure D, leaving ~$20–21M for future phases or matching.
  • Financial analysis excludes potential $20M Safe Streets for All grant.
  • Ongoing cost tracking; current funding gap addressed via Consolidated Grant Program application, with decisions expected in November.

Distribution of Funds and Project Wrap-Up

  • Majority of funds distributed to city and county of Santa Cruz.
  • Significant portion allocated to corridor maintenance.
  • Some funding dedicated to city of Watsonville.
  • Project concept report used for trail alignment development in Watsonville.
  • Regional portion of North Coast Trail under development.
Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

10/2/25 SCCRTC Part 5 - Coastal Trail Project Delivery

10/2/25 SCCRTC Part 5 - Coastal Trail Project Delivery