Discover#SistersInLaw170: A Man Is Not A Plan
170: A Man Is Not A Plan

170: A Man Is Not A Plan

Update: 2024-02-175
Share

Description

Barb McQuade hosts #SistersInLaw to review the Fani Willis hearing, describe the effect it will have on the RICO prosecution, and weigh the potential for her disqualification.  Then the #Sisters discuss the $350+ million civil fraud judgment against Trump, the damages caused by his fraud and tax evasion, the restrictions on his family’s business activities, and how the payment process works.  They also cover the scheduling of his New York hush money trial in late March, the progress of his immunity claim and its impact on the DC trial, and the necessity of a speedy trial.   





Get your #SistersInLaw gear or the perfect gift at politicon.com/merch



WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT



Email: SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or Thread to @sistersInLaw.podcast



Get Barb’s New Book: 

Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America



Barb’s Book Tour 



Mentioned By The #Sisters:



From Kim on the impact of Trump’s fraud and tax evasion



Please Support This Week’s Sponsors



Blueland:

For 15% off your order of green cleaning products, go to blueland.com/sisters



Helix: 

Helix is offering 20% off all mattress orders and two free pillows for our listeners! Go to helixsleep.com/sisters and use code: HELIXPARTNER20



Reel Paper:

Get 30% off a subscription and free shipping on sustainable paper products for your home when you go to reelpaper.com/sil and use promo code: SIL



HoneyLove: 

Get 20% OFF @honeylove by going to honeylove.com/sisters! #honeylovepod



Get More From #SistersInLaw

Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC | Civil Discourse Substack



Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President



Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR | Unbound Newsletter



Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC
Comments (2)

V K

On Willis/Wade: such a sham outrage: when the judge asks the defence attorney, which facts or how would he point to misconduct (of F.Willis), his answer is "You know it when you see it". Would any judge accept that as a legal standard? The strongest argument Mr Abbate brought up was: if they had some kind of a scheme going on, wouldn't Willis/Ware want the case to go slowly,so they could profit longer? Instead, they pressed for speed (because of election years etc). Looks like case closed

Mar 2nd
Reply (1)
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

170: A Man Is Not A Plan

170: A Man Is Not A Plan

Politicon