Discover#SistersInLaw190: Immunity, Immunity, Immunity
190: Immunity, Immunity, Immunity

190: Immunity, Immunity, Immunity

Update: 2024-07-064
Share

Description

Jill Wine-Banks hosts #SistersInLaw to explain the majority opinion, concurrences, and dissents in the SCOTUS immunity decision, looking at what would have happened if the case had been decided in the Nixon era, the effect on Trump’s trials and the presidency, and the growing risk of despotism.  Then, the #Sisters review recent rulings on social media moderation that kicked the ball back to the lower courts, breaking down the difference between a facial and applied legal challenge.  They also review the impact of Chevron deference being overturned on our safety, health care, and democratic processes.



Get your #SistersInLaw merchandise at politicon.com/merch



WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT



Email: SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or Thread to @sistersInLaw.podcast



Get text updates from #SistersInLaw and Politicon. 



Please Support This Week’s Sponsors:



Factor:

Get 50% off your first box, plus 20% off your next box, of delicious, premium quality, ready-to-eat meals with code SIL50 at factormeals.com/sil50



Aura:

Protect yourself and your loved ones online with a 14-day trial plus a check of your data to see if your personal information has been leaked when you go to aura.com/sisters



Osea Malibu:

Get 10% off your order of clean beauty products from OSEA Malibu, with free samples and free shipping on orders over $60, when you go to oseamalibu.com and use promo code: SISTERS



Olive & June:

Get 20% off your mani system when you go to oliveandjune.com/sil and use promo code: SIL



Helix:

Get up to 30% off all mattress orders and two free pillows for our listeners! Go to helixsleep.com/sisters 



Mentioned By The #Sisters:



Barb on KBJ’s dissent in Snyder v. United States



Barb on Trump’s legal future after the SCOTUS immunity decision



Jill on what the SCOTUS immunity decision would have meant for Nixon



Dahlia Lithwick on the gender dynamics on the Supreme Court



The “Blackie The Cat” Decision



Get Barb’s New Book: 



Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America



Barb’s Book Tour 



Get More From #SistersInLaw

Joyce Vance: Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC | Civil Discourse Substack



Jill Wine-Banks: Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President



Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR | Unbound Newsletter



Barb McQuade: Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC






Comments (1)

ncooty

Joyce's answer about a death b/t election and certification omitted legal citations. Her answer seems both specious and nonsensical. I'll need to look into it more, but procedurally, it seems the secretaries of state for each state would still certify the results of the election, independent of the health of the candidates. After all, we rather stupidly still merely elect *electors* for candidates, not candidates per se. The whole Electoral College system is inconsistent and incoherent.

Jul 6th
Reply
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

190: Immunity, Immunity, Immunity

190: Immunity, Immunity, Immunity

Politicon