Open access articles have democratized the availability of scientific research, but are author-paid publication fees undermining the quality of science?

The preprint by Morgan and Smaldino - https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3ez9v

Paul Smaldino's text book - Modeling social behavior

Main edisode takeaways (AI-assisted summary)

• There is a wide variability in the quality of papers published in gold open access journals and a wide variate of open access journals, some of which prioritise quality research


• Diamond open access and green open access are alternative models to consider.


• The publishing industry needs more transparency and mandatory reporting of data. The pressure to publish more can lead to a crowding out problem and a focus on quantity over quality.


• Determining the quality of journals and papers is challenging, and there are varying levels of quality within different tiers of journals.


• Fraudulent publishing practices, such as paper mills and fake papers, can be facilitated by the market for publishing.


• The Publons service (R.I.P) and similar platforms can improve the transparency of peer review and provide a record of reviewers' contributions.


• Society journals may offer a better publishing model as they have a reputation to maintain and are less likely to prioritize quantity over quality.

Other links

Everything Hertz on social media

• Dan on twitter


• James on twitter


• Everything Hertz on twitter


• Everything Hertz on Facebook

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

• $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show


• $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month

Citation

Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2024, Sept 5). 184: A race to the bottom, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3MUJV

Support Everything Hertz