DiscoverEverything Hertz188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity
188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity

188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity

Update: 2025-01-30
Share

Description

Dan and James discuss a recent editorial which argues that double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity.



Links





Other links

Everything Hertz on Bluesky





Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!




  • $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show

  • $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month



Citation



Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2025, Jan 30). Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6XS29

Support Everything Hertz

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity

188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity

Dan Quintana