DiscoverBad Ideas about Writing50: Machines Can Evaluate Writing Well, by Chris M. Anson & Les Perelman
50: Machines Can Evaluate Writing Well, by Chris M. Anson & Les Perelman

50: Machines Can Evaluate Writing Well, by Chris M. Anson & Les Perelman

Update: 2022-01-14
Share

Description

Kyle Stedman (@kstedman) reads the bad idea "Machines Can Evaluate Writing Well," by Chris M. Anson and Les Perelman. It's a chapter first published in Bad Ideas about Writing, which was edited by Cheryl E. Ball (@s2ceball) and Drew M. Loewe (@drewloewe). Don't miss the joke: the author of the chapter is disagreeing with the bad idea stated in the chapter's title.


Keywords: essay grading, high-stakes writing tests, machine scoring, standardized tests, writing assessment


Chris Anson is Distinguished University Professor and director of the Campus Writing and Speaking Program at North Carolina State University, where he works with faculty across the curriculum to improve the way that writing is integrated into all disciplines. For almost four decades, he has studied, taught, and written about writing and learning to write, especially at the high school and college levels. He is past chair of the Conference on College Composition and Communication and past president of the Council of Writing Program Administrators. He has studied and written about writing and computer technology and is a strong advocate of increased attention to digital modes of communication in instruction, but his research does not support the use of computers to score the evaluation of high-stakes writing tests. (2017 bio)


Les Perelman recently retired as director of Writing Across the Curriculum in the department of Comparative Media Studies/Writing at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he has also served as an associate dean in the Office of the Dean of Undergraduate Education. He is currently a research affiliate at MIT. He is a member of the executive committee of the Conference on College Composition and Communication and co-chairs that organization’s Committee on Assessment. Under a grant from Microsoft, Dr. Perelman developed an online evaluation system for writing that allows student access to readings and time to plan, draft, and revise essays for a variety of assessment contexts. Perelman has become a well-known critic of certain standardized writing tests and especially the use of computers to evaluate writing. (2017 bio)


As always, the theme music is "Parade" by nctrnm, and both the book and podcast are licensed by a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The full book was published by the West Virginia University Libraries and Digital Publishing Institute; find it online for free at https://textbooks.lib.wvu.edu/badideas.


All ad revenue will be split between the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund and the Computers and Writing Graduate Research Network.

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

50: Machines Can Evaluate Writing Well, by Chris M. Anson & Les Perelman

50: Machines Can Evaluate Writing Well, by Chris M. Anson & Les Perelman

Kyle Stedman