DiscoverSupreme Court of Canada Cases In Brief68. Threlfall v. Carleton University 2019
68. Threlfall v. Carleton University 2019

68. Threlfall v. Carleton University 2019

Update: 2023-01-29
Share

Description

Threlfall v. Carleton University


If a Quebecker is found dead within seven years of going missing, it can retroactively affect payments that were based on them being alive, the Supreme Court has ruled.


Decision

Date: October 31, 2019

Neutral Citation: 2019 SCC 50

Breakdown of the decision:

Majority: Chief Justice Richard Wagner and Justice Clément Gascon dismissed the appeal (Justices AbellaKarakatsanisRowe, and Martin agreed)

Dissenting: Justices Suzanne Côté and Russell Brown said the proof of death shouldn’t retroactively affect Mr. Roseme’s right to his pension, so Ms. Threlfall shouldn’t have to pay the money back to Carleton (Justice Moldaver agreed)


On appeal from the Court of Appeal of Quebec

Case information (37893)

Webcast of hearing


Lower court rulings:

Motion to institute proceedings (Superior Court of Quebec)

Appeal (Court of Appeal of Quebec)


Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

68. Threlfall v. Carleton University 2019

68. Threlfall v. Carleton University 2019