DiscoverSupreme Court of Canada Cases In Brief75. Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General) 2019
75. Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General) 2019

75. Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General) 2019

Update: 2023-01-29
Share

Description

Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General)


Companies are responsible for the cost of complying with environmental orders, not the government, the Supreme Court has ruled.


Decision

Date: December 6, 2019

Neutral Citation: 2019 SCC 60

Breakdown of the decision:

  • Majority: Justices Rosalie Silberman Abella, Michael Moldaver, Andromache Karakatsanis, and Sheilah Martin allowed the appeal
  • Dissenting: Justices Suzanne Côté and Russell Brown said first-party claims weren’t excluded based on the wording of the contract; they would have allowed Resolute’s appeal and dismissed Weyerhaeuser’s and Ontario’s (Justice Rowe agreed)

On appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario

Lower court rulings:


Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

75. Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General) 2019

75. Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Attorney General) 2019