After the Trump Assassination Attempt
Digest
This episode of "What Next" discusses the shooting incident at a Trump rally in Pennsylvania, where a gunman fired multiple shots at the stage before being killed. The incident has sparked conversations about political violence, the security of presidential candidates, and the role of rhetoric in fueling such events. The episode features interviews with David Graham, a political writer for The Atlantic, and Isaac Arndorf, a national political reporter for the Washington Post, who provide insights into the incident and its implications. They discuss the shooter's background, the security lapses that allowed the incident to occur, and the potential impact on the upcoming presidential campaign. The episode also explores the broader context of political violence in the United States, highlighting the increasing frequency of such incidents and the role of political leaders in shaping public attitudes towards violence. The episode concludes with a discussion about the Republican National Convention, which is set to begin on Monday, and the potential impact of the shooting on the event's atmosphere.
Outlines
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
Introduction
This Chapter introduces the episode and the host, Mary C. Curtis, who is filling in for Mary Harris. The episode focuses on the shooting incident at a Trump rally in Pennsylvania and its implications for political violence and the security of presidential candidates.
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
The Victims and the Shooter
This Chapter delves into the details of the shooting incident, focusing on the victims and the shooter. It reveals that Corey Comparator, a 50-year-old man who was shot and killed, was a firefighter, a churchgoer, and a devoted family man. The chapter also provides information about the shooter, Thomas Crooks, a 20-year-old man with no known criminal record or military service. The chapter discusses the discovery of explosive devices in Crooks' car and home, raising further questions about his motives and the potential for a larger attack.
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
The Unprecedented Nature of the Incident
This Chapter examines the historical context of the shooting incident, highlighting its unprecedented nature. It notes that the last time a person who had been elected president or was running for president was wounded by an assassination attempt was in 1981, when Ronald Reagan was shot. The chapter discusses other threats against presidents, including breaches of the White House grounds and gunshots fired at the White House during the Obama administration, but emphasizes that the shooting of Trump is a rare and significant event.
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
Security Concerns and Conspiracy Theories
This Chapter explores the security concerns raised by the shooting incident, particularly regarding the Secret Service's role in protecting the president. It discusses the Secret Service's recent history of security lapses and the potential for serious fallout from the incident. The chapter also examines the emergence of conspiracy theories surrounding the shooting, highlighting the spread of false flags and political conspiracies online. It notes the concerning trend of Republican leaders, including JD Vance and Tim Scott, blaming Democrats for the incident, suggesting that rhetoric about Trump's authoritarianism is responsible for the violence.
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
A New Era of Political Violence
This Chapter delves into the broader context of political violence in the United States, arguing that the shooting incident is part of a "terrible new era of political violence." It cites a string of recent incidents, including the shooting of people practicing for the congressional baseball game, the riot in Charlottesville, Virginia, the pipe bomber in the 2018 midterm campaign, the shooting of the synagogue in Pittsburgh, the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, and the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband. The chapter discusses the dangers of political violence, its tendency to self-reinforce, and the difficulty of lowering the temperature in a highly polarized political climate.
Keywords
Donald Trump
Donald John Trump is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021. He is a controversial figure known for his outspoken views, his business ventures, and his reality television career. He is currently running for president again in 2024.
Republican National Convention
The Republican National Convention is a quadrennial event held by the Republican Party to formally nominate its presidential and vice presidential candidates. The convention is typically held in the summer before the presidential election. The 2024 Republican National Convention is scheduled to take place in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, from July 15 to 18.
Political Violence
Political violence refers to the use of violence or the threat of violence to achieve political goals. It can take many forms, including assassination, terrorism, riots, and civil war. Political violence is often motivated by ideology, religion, or ethnicity. It can be a symptom of political instability, social unrest, or a breakdown in the rule of law.
Secret Service
The United States Secret Service is a federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the president, vice president, their families, and other high-ranking government officials. The Secret Service also investigates financial crimes, such as counterfeiting and identity theft. The agency has been criticized in recent years for security lapses and misconduct by its agents.
Conspiracy Theory
A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that attributes it to a secret plot by powerful individuals or groups. Conspiracy theories often involve claims of hidden agendas, cover-ups, and manipulation. They can be based on speculation, misinformation, or deliberate disinformation. Conspiracy theories can be harmful because they can erode trust in institutions, promote distrust and division, and lead to violence.
Deep State
The term "deep state" refers to a shadowy network of government officials, intelligence agencies, and other powerful individuals who are believed to be operating behind the scenes to control the government and influence policy. The concept of a deep state is often used to explain events that are perceived as being beyond the control of elected officials. It is a controversial idea that is often used to promote conspiracy theories and distrust in government.
January 6th
January 6, 2021, was the day a mob of Donald Trump's supporters stormed the United States Capitol Building in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The attack was a direct assault on American democracy and resulted in the deaths of five people. The event has been widely condemned by both Democrats and Republicans, and it has led to numerous investigations and criminal charges.
Authoritarianism
Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by strong central power, limited political freedom, and suppression of dissent. Authoritarian regimes often rely on force, intimidation, and propaganda to maintain control. They may also restrict freedom of speech, assembly, and the press. Authoritarianism is a threat to democracy because it undermines the rule of law, human rights, and individual liberties.
Fascism
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian ideology that emphasizes nationalism, militarism, and the suppression of opposition. Fascist regimes often use violence and propaganda to control the population. They may also promote a cult of personality around a charismatic leader. Fascism is a threat to democracy because it undermines the rule of law, human rights, and individual liberties.
Q&A
What are the key security concerns raised by the shooting incident at the Trump rally?
The shooting incident has raised serious questions about the Secret Service's ability to protect the president, particularly in light of their recent history of security lapses. The fact that the gunman was able to fire multiple shots at the stage before being stopped raises concerns about the effectiveness of security measures and the potential for future incidents.
How has the shooting incident fueled conspiracy theories and political division?
The shooting incident has quickly become a breeding ground for conspiracy theories, with many people online spreading false flags and political conspiracies. This trend is exacerbated by the fact that some Republican leaders have blamed Democrats for the incident, suggesting that rhetoric about Trump's authoritarianism is responsible for the violence. This type of rhetoric further divides the country and makes it more difficult to address the issue of political violence in a constructive way.
What are the broader implications of the shooting incident for the future of American democracy?
The shooting incident is a stark reminder of the dangers of political violence and the fragility of American democracy. It highlights the increasing frequency of such incidents and the role of political leaders in shaping public attitudes towards violence. The incident also raises concerns about the potential for further violence in the upcoming presidential campaign, particularly given the highly polarized political climate and the ease with which people can access firearms.
How might the shooting incident affect the Republican National Convention and the upcoming presidential campaign?
The shooting incident is likely to have a significant impact on the Republican National Convention, which is set to begin on Monday. The event's atmosphere is likely to be more tense and security measures will likely be heightened. The incident could also affect the upcoming presidential campaign, particularly the way in which candidates address the issue of political violence and the role of rhetoric in fueling such events.
What are the key differences in how Democrats and Republicans have responded to the threat of political violence?
Democrats and Republicans have responded to the threat of political violence in very different ways. Democrats have consistently condemned political violence and have called for a more civil and respectful political discourse. Republicans, on the other hand, have been more selective in their condemnation of political violence, often downplaying or even justifying incidents that involve their own supporters. This double standard has contributed to the perception that Republicans are more tolerant of political violence than Democrats.
Show Notes
Former president Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt Saturday during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. While the gunman has been identified, law enforcement have not offered a potential motivation for the attack. The incident comes at a time of heightened political violence, when more Americans think such acts are justifiable.
Guests: Isaac Arnsdorf, national political reporter for The Washington Post, and David Graham, staff writer at The Atlantic.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices