Are Rookie Cards Overrated? The Great Insert Debate
Description
In the final part of our post-National panel with Josh Adams and Chris McGill, the conversation shifts from comps to one of the hobby’s longest-running debates — rookie cards versus inserts and parallels. We explore why certain 90s insert sets deserve more respect, the psychology behind collectors’ preferences, and whether the rookie card’s dominance is partly a manufactured narrative. From power dynamics in auctions to the underrated beauty of “one-and-done” insert runs, this wrap-up delivers strong opinions, surprising perspectives, and plenty of hobby banter.
Highlights include:
Breaking down who really has the power to set a comp: buyer, underbidder, or seller
Underrated 90s insert and parallel sets — from Passing the Torch to One of a Kind
How Michael Jordan’s rare Stadium Club parallels compare to PMGs and Star Rubies
The psychology behind collectors’ love for shiny, eye-catching cards
Why some in the hobby dismiss inserts and others see them as core collectibles
Are rookie cards a hobby tradition or a manufactured gimmick?
How modern inserts differ from their 90s counterparts in rarity and appeal
The argument for collecting championship-year or iconic-moment cards instead of rookies
Final reflections from the National, including the growing phenomenon of late-night trade nights
Lighthearted moments, from hoodie-for-candy “comps” to memorable post-show interactions
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
United States
