This podcast is based on clinical scenarios from the official AMC Handbook of Clinical Assessment published by the Australian Medical Council. All cases are used solely for study and discussion. We provide personal learning insights and clinical interpretations to support AMC candidates in developing their clinical reasoning skills. The AMC Handbook is the intellectual property of the Australian Medical Council. To access the official material, please visit the AMC website.

This episode outlines a medical scenario involving a pregnant 33-year-old woman named Miriam, who is seven months pregnant and experiencing a severe hemorrhage. The critical conflict arises because Miriam, a Jehovah's Witness, refuses a life-saving blood transfusion due to her religious beliefs, despite the risk to both herself and her baby. The case details the legal and ethical complexities surrounding patient autonomy versus the medical imperative to preserve life, particularly concerning a third party (the unborn child). It emphasises the need for healthcare providers to counsel the patient appropriately while navigating the legal framework in Australia regarding maternal decisions and fetal rights, ultimately focusing on obtaining legally valid consent in a high-stakes situation.

#AMC #OSCE #ClinicalReasoning #MedicalEducation #IMGs #AustralianMedicalCouncil #JehovahsWitness #BloodTransfusionRefusal #MedicalEthics #PatientAutonomy #PregnancyComplications #EmergencyMedicine #LegalDilemma #ReligiousFreedom #AntenatalCare #AustraliaLaw