This podcast is based on clinical scenarios from the official AMC Handbook of Clinical Assessment published by the Australian Medical Council. All cases are used solely for study and discussion. We provide personal learning insights and clinical interpretations to support AMC candidates in developing their clinical reasoning skills. The AMC Handbook is the intellectual property of the Australian Medical Council. To access the official material, please visit the AMC website.

This episode outlines a simulated medical scenario where a general practitioner is faced with an end-of-life request from a terminally ill patient, Sally, who has pancreatic cancer and wishes to end her life. The core purpose is to assess a candidate's ability to navigate the complex ethical and legal dilemmas surrounding such a request. Key themes include the patient's right to autonomy, the doctor's obligation to do good and not cause harm, and the distinction between various forms of medical intervention at the end of life, such as euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and the Doctrine of Double Effect, with a clear emphasis on which actions are legally permissible.

#AMC #OSCE #ClinicalReasoning #MedicalEducation #IMGs #AustralianMedicalCouncil #EndofLifeCare #MedicalEthics #PatientAutonomy #Euthanasia #PhysicianAssistedSuicide #PalliativeCare #TerminalIllness #HealthcareLaw #DoctorsDilemma