EXPLAINER: Cyrus Mistry Termination Case

Update: 2019-12-25

Description

I have discussed four major issues of the widely noticed NCLAT judgment: 1. What is the scope of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 for relief against oppression and mismanagement 2. Whether the tribunal can hold any Article illegal on the ground that it is illegal 3. Whether the termination of mr Cyrus Mistry was illegal 4. Whether the conversion of the public company Tata Sons Ltd. into a priavte company was legal.

Comments

In Channel

Dissecting the CRYPTO: Ban Bitcoins or Regulate Them?

2020-08-3158:04

EXPLAINER: NTT DOCOMO INC V TATA SONS LTD- Role of Regulatory bodies in Foreign-seated Arbitrations?

2020-08-1133:51

WHAT TO READ: 3 STRATEGIES FOR A LAW STUDENT

2020-07-0307:22

COVID-19, Force Majeure and Frustration of Contracts

2020-03-2322:53

Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on Law and Technology

2020-03-1107:08

EXPLAINER: Cyrus Mistry Termination Case

2019-12-2516:22

The Jet Saga: Could India not handle corporates?

2019-07-1714:09

Liquidated damages in India: Analysis of contract law and landmark contract cases

2019-06-2313:54

The Bank Nationalisation Case

2019-06-0314:52

Do illegal migrants have to right to appeal in India?

2019-05-1904:56

Refugee Crisis and the Global Compact for Refugees of 2018

2019-05-1121:39

00:00

EXPLAINER: Cyrus Mistry Termination Case

#box-pro-ellipsis-176522960612476{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}EXPLAINER: Cyrus Mistry Termination Case

EXPLAINER: Cyrus Mistry Termination Case

SS 105

EXPLAINER: Cyrus Mistry Termination Case