DiscoverINSOL TalksEp. 55 - US Supreme Court in Purdue Pharma and the fate of third-party releases in the United States
Ep. 55 - US Supreme Court in Purdue Pharma and the fate of third-party releases in the United States

Ep. 55 - US Supreme Court in Purdue Pharma and the fate of third-party releases in the United States

Update: 2024-09-11
Share

Description

Prof. Antony Casey, University of Chicago and Prof. Ralph Brubaker, University of Illinois, USA, discuss the ground-breaking ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. This ruling addresses the issue of non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 plans of reorganisation. Prof. Casey and Prof. Brubaker discuss their conflicting opinions on this ruling, and the future of consensual and non-consensual third-party releases in the United States.

Join the conversation on Twitter or LinkedIn using #INSOLTalks
Follow INSOL ERA on Twitter @ERA_insol

Follow on LinkedIn: Tony & Ralph

Interviewer: Ilya Kokorin, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Introduction and credits voiced by Lisa McNeil, INSOL International
Edited and produced by Harriet Norman, INSOL International

Music by jorikbasov

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Ep. 55 - US Supreme Court in Purdue Pharma and the fate of third-party releases in the United States

Ep. 55 - US Supreme Court in Purdue Pharma and the fate of third-party releases in the United States