Errors and uncertainties in ocean colour remote sensing (1)
Update: 2011-12-13
Description
One of the main questions you will be asked as a remote sensing expert is: how reliable and good is information, which we derive from remotely sensed ocean colour data? Can we trust them? What is the error or uncertainty range of these data? In this section of the IOCCG training course, which consists of 3 lectures and exercises, we will look into this problem.
Lectures
The first lecture will be dedicated to the sources of uncertainties. We have to consider that our observations are the reflectivity in a number of spectral bands, which are measured at the top of atmosphere (TOA) or, in case of an aircraft platform, in a certain height above the water. We try nothing less than to isolate, retrieve and quantify a small effect on these spectra, which is caused by absorption and scattering of e.g. of phytoplankton, from a large number of other effects, of which in particular the atmosphere dominates the TOA spectrum. Problems of this kind may induce large uncertainties. In some cases it might be even impossible to retrieve reliable information of the ocean from remotely sensed reflectance spectra. Thus, one important area of ocean colour research is to analyze sources of uncertainties, to develop methods to quantify uncertainties and finally to find way to reduce uncertainties.
In this lecture we will consider
Natural factors, which determine uncertainties, and their variability
Uncertainties, which are induced by reducing the manifold of factors to a few dominant wavelength (nm)
Radiance (Wm‐2 sr‐1 μm‐1) air molecules different aerosols thin clouds
Sky reflectance Sun glint foam floating material chlorophyll
Suspended particles different phytoplankton species dissolved organic matter
Vertical distribution Bottom reflection contrails
Factors, which determine top of atmosphere reflection spectra, from which try to retrieve e.g. the chlorophyll concentration
Errors caused by spaceborne or airborne instruments: calibration, ageing, noise
Errors caused by in situ measurements, sampling and procedures
Problem of comparing in situ with space borne
In the second lecture we look into procedures, how to determine uncertainties:
How to quantify uncertainties: scatter, bias, robustness, stability
Validation procedures and strategies
Testing of algorithms
Round robin exercises
Sensitivity studies
Determination of uncertainties on a pixel by pixel bases
flagging
The third lecture will finally discuss the results of our exercises and will be dedicated to the question, how to reduce uncertainties. This is a wide field, where a lot of research is still needed, and it offers themes for your future work.
Detection of spectra / pixels, which are out of scope of the algorithm
Masking of clouds and cloud shadows
Use of additional information
Pre‐classification of water types and use of dedicated algorithms
How to produce maps from satellite data, which include information about uncertainties.
Lectures
The first lecture will be dedicated to the sources of uncertainties. We have to consider that our observations are the reflectivity in a number of spectral bands, which are measured at the top of atmosphere (TOA) or, in case of an aircraft platform, in a certain height above the water. We try nothing less than to isolate, retrieve and quantify a small effect on these spectra, which is caused by absorption and scattering of e.g. of phytoplankton, from a large number of other effects, of which in particular the atmosphere dominates the TOA spectrum. Problems of this kind may induce large uncertainties. In some cases it might be even impossible to retrieve reliable information of the ocean from remotely sensed reflectance spectra. Thus, one important area of ocean colour research is to analyze sources of uncertainties, to develop methods to quantify uncertainties and finally to find way to reduce uncertainties.
In this lecture we will consider
Natural factors, which determine uncertainties, and their variability
Uncertainties, which are induced by reducing the manifold of factors to a few dominant wavelength (nm)
Radiance (Wm‐2 sr‐1 μm‐1) air molecules different aerosols thin clouds
Sky reflectance Sun glint foam floating material chlorophyll
Suspended particles different phytoplankton species dissolved organic matter
Vertical distribution Bottom reflection contrails
Factors, which determine top of atmosphere reflection spectra, from which try to retrieve e.g. the chlorophyll concentration
Errors caused by spaceborne or airborne instruments: calibration, ageing, noise
Errors caused by in situ measurements, sampling and procedures
Problem of comparing in situ with space borne
In the second lecture we look into procedures, how to determine uncertainties:
How to quantify uncertainties: scatter, bias, robustness, stability
Validation procedures and strategies
Testing of algorithms
Round robin exercises
Sensitivity studies
Determination of uncertainties on a pixel by pixel bases
flagging
The third lecture will finally discuss the results of our exercises and will be dedicated to the question, how to reduce uncertainties. This is a wide field, where a lot of research is still needed, and it offers themes for your future work.
Detection of spectra / pixels, which are out of scope of the algorithm
Masking of clouds and cloud shadows
Use of additional information
Pre‐classification of water types and use of dedicated algorithms
How to produce maps from satellite data, which include information about uncertainties.
Comments
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
In Channel