This narrative traces a pivotal moment in open-source history, triggered by Red Hat’s 2020 decision to discontinue the widely used CentOS Linux in favor of CentOS Stream—a less stable, upstream development version—followed by a 2023 move to restrict public access to RHEL source code. These actions, widely perceived as a betrayal of open-source principles, threatened the stability of countless businesses, startups, and institutions reliant on free, enterprise-grade Linux. The backlash was swift and severe, uniting competitors and community members in outrage. In response, the Open Enterprise Linux Association (OpenELA) was formed by SUSE, Oracle, and CIQ (creators of Rocky Linux) to ensure ongoing, open access to RHEL-compatible source code. Leveraging the legal protections of the GPLv2 license, OpenELA established a collaborative, multi-vendor model to distribute verified source code, thereby preserving the ecosystem’s diversity and resilience. This initiative not only provided a lifeline to organizations facing costly migrations but also reinforced the power of community-driven development in resisting corporate control. The saga underscores critical ethical and policy issues: the tension between corporate profitability and open-source stewardship, the importance of transparency and trust, and the need for sustainable governance models in foundational technologies. By enabling continued innovation and reducing vendor lock-in, OpenELA has helped safeguard the reliability of global digital infrastructure, impacting everything from streaming services to banking platforms. Its emergence signals a broader shift in how the tech industry may approach open-source collaboration, emphasizing that long-term success depends not just on code, but on respecting the communities that sustain it. The story stands as a defining chapter in the evolution of open source, demonstrating that when core principles are challenged, the community can—and will—organize to defend them.