This is one in a series about possible futures, which will be published in Booch News over the coming weeks. Episode 3 appeared last week. New episodes drop every Friday.

As we look back over the last 75 years, it’s clear that the global fermentation renaissance is a story with many chapters. They wove together multiple legacies that enabled our collective survival and enjoyment of life in the year 2100. Here are nine of those chapters.

1. The Metchnikoff Prophecy: From Nobel Prize to Planetary Transformation

<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"></figure>

The foundations of the fermentations of 2100 can be traced to a prescient insight from 1907, when Nobel laureate Élie Metchnikoff published The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies. His observation that Bulgarian peasants consuming fermented milk lived remarkably long lives—and his subsequent isolation of L. bulgaricus—established the scientific foundation for what would become humanity’s biological salvation.

Metchnikoff’s prophetic words resonated across the centuries:

From time immemorial human beings have absorbed quantities of lactic microbes by consuming in the uncooked condition substances such as soured milk, kephir, sauerkraut, or salted cucumbers which have undergone lactic fermentation. By these means they have unknowingly lessened the evil consequences of intestinal putrefaction.

By 2075, his “intestinal putrefaction” theory had become the foundational framework of the Global Microbiome Crisis—a recognition that industrial food had systematically destroyed humanity’s internal ecosystem.

2. The Wolfe Revolution: Mapping Humanity’s Microbial Heritage

Dr. Benjamin Wolfe II’s 2089 breakthrough at the Tufts Planetary Fermentation Institute was directly traced to his grandfather’s 2020s research, which analyzed 500 sourdough starters across four continents. The older Wolfe discovered that household fermentation cultures contained vastly more microbial diversity than commercial operations. This insight became crucial when climate change destroyed industrial food systems.

<figure class="aligncenter size-large"></figure>

The younger Wolfe’s research titled the “Global Fermentation Genome Project” expanded his grandfather’s Medford research to catalog over 2.3 million distinct fermentation cultures from every inhabited region on Earth, creating humanity’s most precious database. When traditional agriculture collapsed, these preserved microbial libraries became the genetic foundation for survival. Communities could resurrect ancient fermentation practices using Wolfe’s genomic blueprints, ensuring that local food cultures survived even when their original ecosystems disappeared.

Wolfe’s research proved that fermentation diversity directly correlated with human resilience. Populations with access to diverse fermented foods showed superior adaptation to climate stress, disease resistance, and cognitive performance. His “Microbial Diversity Index” became the most accurate predictor of community survival in the climate-changed world.

One day at the Tufts Institute, Wolfe’s research partner, Dr. Gail Sonenshein, enters carrying emergency reports. “Ben, we have another situation. The refugee settlement in Nevada is experiencing 60% mortality within three months of arrival. Malnutrition, immune collapse, systemic organ failure.”

Wolfe does not hesitate. “What are they eating?”

“Standard industrial rations. Nutritionally complete according to FDA standards. High-calorie, protein-fortified, vitamin-supplemented.”

“And completely dead.” Benjamin pulls up the settlement’s microbiome data. The graphs are devastating: almost no bacterial diversity, compromised gut function, cascading health failures. “The industrial food is killing them faster than starvation would.”

Gail nods grimly. “We have 47 similar settlements reporting identical patterns. Millions of climate refugees are being fed ‘safe’ processed food, and they’re dying anyway. The food provides calories but destroys their microbial ecosystems.”

Benjamin accesses his grandfather’s sourdough archive, searching for cultures from the refugees’ original regions. “What if we could resurrect their traditional fermentation practices? Give them back the microbes they evolved with?”

“Using genetic data to recreate fermented foods from extinct ecosystems?” Gail considers. “That’s never been attempted at scale.”

“Because we never had to before. My grandfather cataloged this diversity, thinking it was merely academic research. Turns out he was creating a survival manual.” Benjamin begins pulling culture samples. “We start with the Nevada settlement. Identify their regional origins, match them with appropriate fermentation cultures, teach them to recreate their traditional foods.”

Gail considers this before asking, “And if it doesn’t work?”

“Then 60% mortality becomes 100%. But if it does work…” Benjamin presents a theoretical model illustrating how restored microbial diversity contributes to health recovery. “We might have the blueprint for saving millions.”

3. The Marco Barrier Studies: Fortifying Human Architecture

Dr. Sandra Marco’s research at UC Davis evolved from her grandmother’s work in the 2020s on sauerkraut metabolites and intestinal barrier function. Her grandmother discovered that fermented foods literally strengthened the gut lining—humanity’s internal “skin” that prevented harmful substances from entering the bloodstream while allowing beneficial nutrients to pass through.

<figure class="aligncenter size-large"></figure>

Sandra addresses visitors to the Davis Intestinal Research Center whose motto “It’s a gut feeling” is on the sweatshirts and beanie hats sold in the college bookstore. “My grandmother discovered that fermented foods repair intestinal architecture. The food industry ignored her because healthy people don’t need pharmaceutical interventions. Sixty years later, we have a population with systematically destroyed gut barriers, dependent on medications to manage symptoms that fermentation could prevent.”

A pharmaceutical representative in the back raises his hand. “Dr. Marco, your accusations are serious. Are you claiming the food industry deliberately compromised human health?”

“I’m claiming the food industry created products that maximize profit by creating dependency,” she responds. “Whether that was deliberate or negligent doesn’t change the result, which is a population with compromised biological barriers requiring lifelong pharmaceutical intervention.”

She displays her research: before-and-after images of intestinal tissue. “This patient consumed a standard American diet for thirty years. Destroyed barrier function, chronic inflammation, autoimmune conditions, depression, cognitive decline that all stemmed from intestinal permeability.”

She advances to the next image. “Same patient, ninety days after starting the Barrier Restoration Protocol. Daily consumption of specific fermented foods in precise combinations. Complete reconstruction of intestinal architecture. All symptoms resolved.”

The pharmaceutical representative stands. “You’re suggesting fermented foods can replace medications? That’s dangerous medical advice.”

“I’m presenting data. This patient was taking twelve medications for conditions caused by poor barrier function. After barrier restoration through fermented foods, she’s taking zero medications. Her conditions needed prevention not treatment.”

She moves on to the next slide. This shows aggregate data from thousands of patients. Marco elaborates: “The Barrier Restoration Protocol works for 94% of participants. Ninety days of targeted fermentation consumption can rebuild what decades of industrial food destroyed. Some call it alternative medicine. We call it addressing root causes instead of managing symptoms.”

A student asks, “Dr. Marco, why isn’t this standard treatment?”

Sandra smiles sadly. “Because my grandmother’s research was inconvenient. Because preventing disease is less profitable than treating it. Because fermented foods can’t be patented. Pick your reason.”

The student persists: “If fermented foods rebuild intestinal barriers, why don’t doctors prescribe them?”

“Because medical schools teach pharmaceutical int