DiscoverCritics at Large | The New YorkerTarot, Tech, and Our Age of Magical Thinking
Tarot, Tech, and Our Age of Magical Thinking

Tarot, Tech, and Our Age of Magical Thinking

Update: 2024-08-292
Share

Description

Until recently, tarot, astrology, and spiritualism—practices often shorthanded simply as woo-woo—were the stuff of dusty psychic parlors and seventies nostalgia. But today, mysticism has permeated mainstream culture. In the third and final installment of the Critics at Large interview series, Vinson Cunningham talks with Jennifer Wilson, a contributing writer at The New Yorker, about this new age of magical thinking. They discuss how “woo” has seeped into our everyday lives through apps such as Co-Star, and how recent TV shows and novels have embraced supernatural themes. With the rise of cryptocurrency and sports betting, speculation about the future has become a fundamental part of our economy, too. “Maybe people would feel less uncertainty that pushes them to consult with astrology and tarot-card readers if there were more security in the present,” Wilson says. “In so many ways, this is a problem we’ve created.” And a bonus: Vinson gets a tarot reading of his own.
Read, watch, and listen with the critics:


The Curse” (2023)
@astropoets
“True Detective” (2014-)
This Is Me . . . Now: A Love Story” (2024)
The White Lotus” (2021-)
Long Island Compromise,” by Taffy Brodesser-Akner
‘The Curse’ and the Magical Thinking of the Speculative Economy,” by Jennifer Wilson
“Look Into My Eyes” (2024)
Speculative Communities: Living with Uncertainty in a Financialized World,” by Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou

 
New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts



Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Tarot, Tech, and Our Age of Magical Thinking

Tarot, Tech, and Our Age of Magical Thinking

The New Yorker