Trump 2.0: A Presidency Driven by Revenge
6Description
In a special series, “The Daily” examines what a second Trump presidency would look like, and how it would challenge democratic norms.
This episode focuses on former President Donald J. Trump’s growing plans for revenge, which his allies and supporters often dismiss as mere bluster.
Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter at The New York Times, found that when Mr. Trump asked for retribution in his first term, he got it, over and over again.
Guest: Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times, covering Washington.
Background reading:
- Here are cases of Trump rivals who were subject to investigation.
- Read excerpts from memos written for Mr. Trump about his powers to prosecute.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
United States
Russia gate The law applies to everyone, not just republicans. It's well known facts that hillary bolroke the law at this point. Jump out documents.He was allowed to have because he was President biden literally had no right to have those files Since he was not president again Democrat breaking the law and getting away with it
this is such bs and you are making are you guys really this dumb? getting paid or just plain brainwashed. when he got into office he did not go after Clinton this is deflecting e erything we do we are gonna blame you for. the only people voting for Trump are rich white folks who aren't effected by high crime or high inflation and the. poor uneducated minorities that don't have the mental Capacity to think for themselves. And if your political rivals are literally breaking laws by spying and
editing on this show has gone done hill. y'all just did a whole podcast using "trump" for examples of qeaponizing federal infrastructure against a political person. y'all meant the Democrats right?