Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.

Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.

Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.

We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.

Dig Deeper

• Missing? or Misinterpreted?
• Two Kinds of Science?