The tariffs on Brazilian beef are back in the headlines, and this time Trump’s decision to lift them has the entire industry on edge. In this episode, we break down what a return to 26% actually means, why agriculture keeps getting used as a political bargaining chip, and how these changes ripple all the way from ranchers to consumers buying ground beef at the store. Lauren and Emma dig into quality concerns, transparency issues, and the long-term implications for a supply chain already stretched thin. This conversation clears the noise so producers can understand what’s signal — and what’s politics.

Links

Emma's Links - https://linktr.ee/doubleeranch ⁠

CattleUSA Website - ⁠https://www.cattleusa.com/⁠

Facebook - ⁠https://www.facebook.com/cattleusamedia⁠

Instagram - ⁠https://www.instagram.com/cattleusa.media/⁠

Subscribe to our newsletter - ⁠https://www.cattleusadrive.com/⁠

CattleUSA Media - ⁠https://www.cattleusamedia.com/⁠

Lauren’s Instagram - ⁠https://www.instagram.com/_laurenmoylan/⁠

Lauren’s Youtube - ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@Showboatmediaco⁠

The Next Generation Podcast Website - ⁠https://www.thenextgenag.com/⁠

Takeaways

Trump lifted tariffs on Brazilian beef, returning to 26%.

Agriculture is often used as a bargaining chip in trade.

Consumers are most affected by rising ground beef prices.

The U.S. is the most efficient beef producer globally.

There is a need for transparency in agricultural decisions.

Imported beef can be labeled as a product of the USA.

The beef industry is facing challenges due to political changes.

Producers are concerned about the quality of imported beef.

The agricultural sector needs to remain hopeful despite challenges.

Future policies should prioritize transparency and communication.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Context of Tariffs

03:17 Impact of Tariff Changes on Agriculture

05:59 The Role of Agriculture as a Bargaining Chip

08:54 Concerns Over Beef Imports and Quality

11:53 Transparency and Future Outlook for Agriculture

tariffs, agriculture, beef production, trade negotiations, US market, transparency, supply chain, consumer impact, political decisions, livestock