Chances are, if you're thinking of listening to this podcast episode, the 2024 election didn't go the way you hoped it would.

 

A lot of people are feeling scared right now. I've heard some people wanting to fight, while others want to hunker down. I've had both of those feelings myself over the last few weeks.

 

I don't usually wade into current events. My brain needs time to process and digest and preferably take in a lot of peer-reviewed research before I can decide what I think.

 

I tried to do something different in this episode: I did read a lot, but I only took notes and then spoke mostly extemporaneously. And now you've seen the length of this episode you'll know why I don't do that very often.

 

In this episode we will help you answer questions like:

• How do our values shape political views and actions?
  

 

• How can we make sense of the way that liberals and conservatives prioritize different values?
  

 

• Is it possible that liberals haven't been truly honest about how we live our values?

 

• What kinds of actions can we take to create true belonging so we don't have to grasp at power?

 

• How can we create true belonging in our families, to live our values honestly and completely?

 

I hope you find this thought-provoking and useful as we all start to think about the ways we can move forward - and keep everyone safe.

 

These are the graphs mentioned on this episode:

Episodes Mentioned:

• 
  

  179: I Never Thought of It That Way with Mónica Guzmán and Lulu

  
  

 

• 
  

  114: How to stop ‘Othering’ and instead ‘Build Belonging’

  
  

 

• 
  

  221: How to advocate for the schools our children deserve with Allyson Criner Brown & Cassie Gardener Manjikian

  
  

 

Books mentioned in this episode:

(Affiliate links)

• Parenting Beyond Power: How to Use Connection and Collaboration to Transform Your Family - and the World, by Jen Lumanlan

 

• Belonging without Othering, by John A. Powell and Stephen Menendian

 

• Schedule your own Red/Blue conversation through Braver Angels

 

Jump to highlights:

 

03:50 References to Dr. John Powell’s and Dr. Jonathan Haidt’s work, particularly The Righteous Mind, exploring political views.

 

04:45 Explanation of Haidt's five moral foundations and their impact on political perspectives.

 

07:00 Comparison of liberal and conservative priorities around moral foundations.

 

08:36 Discussion on care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and sanctity in policies.

 

10:46 Exploration of government intervention, wealth redistribution, immigration, and in-group loyalty.

 

13:06 Discussion on understanding and addressing the underlying needs of both groups.

 

17:46 Examples of Social Security and the GI Bill’s exclusionary practices.

 

19:16 Discussion of economic disparities and the call for fair, inclusive policies.

 

22:38 References to sociologist Arlie Hochschild’s work on the economic story behind Trump’s support.

 

24:00 Examination of cultural and economic factors influencing Trump’s voter base.

 

28:50  Examples of identity threats leading to group cohesion.

 

32:30 Advocacy for listening to Trump voters to understand their perspectives.

 

36:39 Explanation of targeted universalism to create inclusive policies.

 

38:25 Emphasis on policies that promote belonging and equity for all groups.

 

47:03 Discussion on the need for a new vision of masculinity and racially integrated relationships.

 

52:04 Emphasis on men understanding and supporting their partners’ needs.

 

01:00:53 Health benefits of belonging and the need to address exclusion.

 

01:03:27 Encouragement for civic engagement and understanding diverse perspectives to build an inclusive society.

 

01:28:07 Jen’s closing message on creating a world where everyone belongs.

 

 

[accordion]

[accordion-item title="Click here to read the full transcript"]

Adrian 00:03

Adrian, Hi, I'm Adrien in suburban Chicagoland, and this is your parenting Mojo with Jen Lumanlan. Jen is working on a series of episodes based on the challenges you are having with your child, from tooth brushing to sibling fighting to the endless resistance to whatever you ask, Jen will look across all the evidence from 1000s of scientific papers across a whole range of topics related to parenting and child development to help you see solutions to the issue you're facing that hadn't seen possible before. If you'd like a personalized answer to your challenge, just make a video if possible, or an audio clip if not. That's less than one minute long that describes what's happening, and email it to support at your parentingmojo.com and listen out for your episode soon.

Jen Lumanlan 00:52

Hello and welcome to the Your Parenting Mojo podcast. Last time I did an episode like this was in January of 2020, right after the US capital was stormed. And so this is the only episode I've done since then that focuses on current events, and it is not one that I have tightly scripted, because I would have taken another two weeks to be able to do that. And so it's definitely an episode that I don't feel totally comfortable with. So I just want you to kind of know that going in, I don't find it easy to comment on current issues, because I need time to process and digest but this was kind of too big to let pass. So I find it hard to know what to say about big events like the election, because I'm not a political analyst, and frankly, it kind of drives me up the wall when people who don't have much knowledge about child development and parenting, uh, kind of like, you know, economists tell us how to raise our children, and because making the best decisions for one family using economic rationale doesn't help us to create a society that benefits all families. And so if you have sophisticated political analysis, you may find mine to be lacking. It's mostly drawn from other sources which are cited in the references for this episode. I do draw very heavily on Dr John Powell's work, and you can hear from him in our episode 114 on how to stop othering and instead build belonging. And he has a new book out that I was very interested to read, and I also draw heavily on Dr Jonathan Heights work as well. So what I'm going to do today is to kind of share some ideas that I hesitate to share because they may not be popular with listeners. Not everybody sees the connections between politics and parenting or wants to see them. Parents have told me that they put off episodes related to social issues that I have recorded for, quote, unquote when they have time, and that they focus primarily on the episodes that will help them with their children's behavior, which I totally get. But then they tell me, Well, I just, you know, I never have time. And so I do wonder, Are we a little more willing today to start to see the connections between the ways that we are raising our children, between the political climate and you know, our children's future. And so a lot of people have already written about why Trump won, and so I'm going to draw on those ideas and try to understand what that means for our families, for our culture, for where we go from here, connecting quite a few different ideas from different places. Because I think the argument that all the people who voted for Trump are racist misogynist is kind of dangerous. I don't think that that's really real. Maybe some of them are for sure, most of them are not. And so why did they vote for him? Where do we go from here? Can we avoid going through this again? And if so, how do we do that? And so the first tool that I'm going to draw on is Dr Jonathan Haidt model The Righteous Mind. And I have to give a hat tip to Dr Ari Parsi, whom I interviewed in a podcast episode a few months ago, and she was the person who introduced me to his work. I actually read it after I had already written parenting beyond power, and as I read it, I was like, yes, yes, yes. And I wish all of this could have been in the book as well. So it was too late that ship had sailed by that point, and so the purpose of the book is to to kind of uncover how liberals and conservatives have such different ideas about what's right and what's wrong, and the underlying idea is that our opinions are really kin