The Surprise Ending to the Mar-a-Lago Documents Case
Digest
A federal judge dismissed the classified documents case against Donald Trump, citing the unconstitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment. The judge ruled that Justice Department regulations alone are insufficient to appoint or govern a Special Counsel, requiring either a law passed by Congress or a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation. This decision departs from decades of precedent and has sparked debate about the future of special counsels and the balance between prosecutorial independence and accountability. The ruling has been widely seen as a political victory for Trump, bolstering his narrative that the cases against him are politically motivated and unlawful. The case is expected to be appealed, potentially reaching the Supreme Court, where Justice Thomas has already expressed doubts about Smith's appointment. The ruling could have significant implications for other cases involving special counsels, including the January 6th case against Trump, and could potentially impact the independence of special prosecutors in the future.
Outlines
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
Introduction
This Chapter introduces Brian Rosenfall, an investigative reporter at the New York Times, who shares his experience with scientific research and how it parallels his work as a journalist. He emphasizes the importance of facts, hypothesis, and thorough investigation in both fields.
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
Trump's Legal Victory
This Chapter discusses the dismissal of the classified documents case against Donald Trump by a federal judge. The judge ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, citing the lack of a law passed by Congress or a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation. This decision has significant implications for the future of special counsels and the balance between prosecutorial independence and accountability.
![](https://s3.castbox.fm/webstatic/images/book.5d108c35.png)
Senator Menendez Convicted
This Chapter reports on the conviction of Senator Robert Menendez on all counts in a scheme to sell his office to foreign powers and corrupt businessmen in exchange for bribes. Menendez is the first US Senator to be convicted of acting as a foreign agent and faces potentially decades in prison. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called for Menendez's immediate resignation, while New Jersey's Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, stated that he would make a temporary appointment to fill the seat if Menendez stepped down.
Keywords
Special Counsel
A prosecutor with some level of independence from the Justice Department who is brought in to handle very sensitive political investigations. They have been appointed differently throughout history, with the current method relying on internal Justice Department regulations. The recent ruling by Judge Cannon has challenged this method, arguing that it violates the Constitution and requires either a law passed by Congress or a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation.
Jack Smith
The Special Counsel appointed to investigate Donald Trump in two cases: the classified documents case and the January 6th case. Judge Cannon ruled that his appointment was unconstitutional, dismissing the classified documents case. This ruling has raised questions about the validity of his appointment in the January 6th case and could potentially impact the future of both cases.
Donald Trump
The former President of the United States who is currently facing multiple legal challenges, including the classified documents case and the January 6th case. The dismissal of the classified documents case is seen as a significant legal victory for Trump, bolstering his narrative that the cases against him are politically motivated and unlawful.
Judge Eileen Cannon
The federal judge who dismissed the classified documents case against Donald Trump. She ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, citing the lack of a law passed by Congress or a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation. Her decision has sparked debate about the future of special counsels and the balance between prosecutorial independence and accountability.
Republican National Convention
The quadrennial event where the Republican Party formally nominates its presidential candidate. The dismissal of the classified documents case against Donald Trump on the first day of the convention was seen as a significant political victory for Trump, allowing him to push back against accusations of wrongdoing and bolster his narrative of a politically motivated witch hunt.
Justice Department
The federal government agency responsible for enforcing the law and administering justice. The Justice Department has been involved in several high-profile investigations involving Donald Trump, including the classified documents case and the January 6th case. The recent ruling by Judge Cannon has raised questions about the Justice Department's authority to appoint and govern special counsels.
Supreme Court
The highest court in the United States, which has the power to review decisions made by lower courts. The dismissal of the classified documents case against Donald Trump is expected to be appealed, potentially reaching the Supreme Court, where Justice Thomas has already expressed doubts about Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment.
Senator Robert Menendez
A Democratic senator from New Jersey who was convicted on all counts in a scheme to sell his office to foreign powers and corrupt businessmen in exchange for bribes. He is the first US Senator to be convicted of acting as a foreign agent and faces potentially decades in prison.
Foreign Agent
An individual or entity that acts on behalf of a foreign government or entity. Senator Robert Menendez was convicted of acting as a foreign agent, meaning he acted on behalf of foreign powers and corrupt businessmen in exchange for bribes. This conviction is a significant event, as it is the first time a US Senator has been convicted of this crime.
Q&A
What was the basis for the dismissal of the classified documents case against Donald Trump?
The judge ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional, citing the lack of a law passed by Congress or a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation. She argued that Justice Department regulations alone are insufficient to appoint or govern a Special Counsel.
What are the potential implications of this ruling for the future of special counsels?
The ruling has sparked debate about the future of special counsels and the balance between prosecutorial independence and accountability. It could potentially lead to more stringent requirements for the appointment of special counsels, potentially limiting their independence and increasing their accountability to political figures.
How could this ruling impact other cases involving special counsels, such as the January 6th case against Trump?
Trump's lawyers in the January 6th case could potentially challenge Jack Smith's appointment based on the ruling in the classified documents case. This could delay or even derail the January 6th case, depending on the outcome of the appeal.
What are the political implications of this ruling for Donald Trump?
The ruling is seen as a significant political victory for Trump, bolstering his narrative that the cases against him are politically motivated and unlawful. It allows him to push back against accusations of wrongdoing and potentially strengthen his position in the upcoming presidential election.
What is the next step in the legal process for the classified documents case?
The case is expected to be appealed, potentially reaching the Supreme Court, where Justice Thomas has already expressed doubts about Jack Smith's appointment. The outcome of the appeal could have significant implications for the future of special counsels and the balance between prosecutorial independence and accountability.
What are the potential consequences of this ruling for the balance between prosecutorial independence and accountability?
The ruling could shift the balance towards greater accountability and less independence for special counsels. This could potentially limit their ability to investigate powerful political figures and hold them accountable for wrongdoing.
What are the potential implications of this ruling for the upcoming presidential election?
The ruling could potentially benefit Donald Trump by bolstering his narrative of a politically motivated witch hunt and weakening the accusations of wrongdoing against him. This could potentially influence voters' perceptions of the cases against him and impact the outcome of the election.
What is the significance of Senator Robert Menendez's conviction?
Menendez's conviction is a significant event, as he is the first US Senator to be convicted of acting as a foreign agent. This conviction highlights the potential for corruption within the US government and raises questions about the effectiveness of existing safeguards against foreign influence.
What are the potential consequences of Menendez's conviction for his political career?
Menendez faces potentially decades in prison and has been called upon to resign by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. If he steps down, New Jersey's Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, will make a temporary appointment to fill the seat.
Show Notes
As the Republican National Convention entered its second day, former President Donald J. Trump and his allies absorbed the stunning new reality that the most formidable legal case against him had been thrown out by a federal judge, who ruled that the appointment of the special counsel who brought the case, Jack Smith, had violated the Constitution.
Alan Feuer, who has been covering the classified documents case for The Times, explains what it means that the case could now be dead.
Guest: Alan Feuer, a reporter covering extremism and political violence for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against Mr. Trump.
- The effort to hold Mr. Trump to account has already yielded a Supreme Court decision giving former presidents broad immunity. Now another case could make prosecuting political figures more complicated.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
How are Democrats not leveraging this verdict as cronyism? Democrats need to flip the deep state narrative.