DiscoverLessWrong (30+ Karma)“The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts” by J Bostock
“The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts” by J Bostock

“The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts” by J Bostock

Update: 2025-10-11
Share

Description

I've noticed an antipattern. It's definitely on the dark pareto-frontier of "bad argument" and "I see it all the time amongst smart people". I'm confident it's the worst, common argument I see amongst rationalists and EAs. I don't normally crosspost to the EA forum, but I'm doing it now. I call it Exhaustive Free Association.

Exhaustive Free Association is a step in a chain of reasoning where the logic goes "It's not A, it's not B, it's not C, it's not D, and I can't think of any more things it could be!"[1] Once you spot it, you notice it all the damn time.

Since I've most commonly encountered this amongst rat/EA types, I'm going to have to talk about people in our community as examples of this.

Examples

Here's a few examples. These are mostly for illustrative purposes, and my case does not rely on me having found [...]

---

Outline:

(00:55 ) Examples

(01:08 ) Security Mindset

(01:25 ) Superforecasters and AI Doom

(02:14 ) With Apologies to Rethink Priorities

(02:45 ) The Fatima Sun Miracle

(03:14 ) Bad Reasoning is Almost Good Reasoning

(05:09 ) Arguments as Soldiers

(06:29 ) Conclusion

(07:04 ) The Counter-Counter Spell

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---


First published:

October 11th, 2025



Source:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/arwATwCTscahYwTzD/the-most-common-bad-argument-in-these-parts


---


Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

“The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts” by J Bostock

“The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts” by J Bostock